Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Work, University College of Southern Denmark, 6700 Degnevej, Denmark
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of online learning self-regulation on learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown among university college students. Quantitative k-means cluster analysis was used to examine the relationship among students in three different clusters based on their preferences toward online learning. The results indicated that online learning self-regulation had a significant positive effect on learning outcomes due to the shift to online learning. Thus, we identified a “learning gradient” among students, showing that cluster 1 students (preferences for 100% online) have the most positive preferences toward online teaching and the highest degree of self-regulation and learning outcome, cluster 2 students (moderate preferences for both physical and online teaching) are mixed (both positive and negative experiences) and moderate self-regulation and learning outcomes while cluster 3 students (preferences for physical classroom teaching) have the most negative preferences and the lowest self-regulation and learning outcome. The results from this study show that students’ self-regulated learning strategies during online teaching environments are important for their learning outcomes and that cluster 1 and 2 students especially profited from the more flexible online learning environment with organized and deep learning approaches. Cluster 3 students need more support from their educators to foster their self-regulation skills to enhance their learning outcomes in online teaching environments.
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference66 articles.
1. The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic;Anthonysamy;Education and Information Technologies,2021
2. Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: Fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning;Anthonysamy;Education and Information Technologies,2020
3. Artelt, Cordula, Baumert, Jurgen, Julius-McElvany, Nele, and Peschar, Jules (2003). Learners for Life: Student Approaches to Learning. Results from PISA 2000, OECD.
4. Asikainen, Henna, and Katajavuori, Nina (2022). First-Year Experience in the COVID-19 Situation and the Association between Students’ Approaches to Learning, Study-Related Burnout and Experiences of Online Studying. Social Sciences, 11.
5. The Interplay between Academic Emotions, Psychological Flexibility and Self-Regulation as Predictors of Academic Achievement;Asikainen;Journal of Further and Higher Education,2018