Stimulus Complexity Can Enhance Art Appreciation: Phenomenological and Psychophysiological Evidence for the Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking

Author:

Husselman Tammy-Ann1ORCID,Filho Edson2,Zugic Luca W.3,Threadgold Emma3,Ball Linden J.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, 62 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK

2. Wheelock College of Education & Human Development, Boston University, 2 Silber Way, Boston, MA 02215, USA

3. School of Psychology & Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Fylde Road, Preston PR1 8TY, UK

Abstract

We tested predictions deriving from the “Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking” (PIA Model), whereby aesthetic preferences arise from two fluency-based processes: an initial automatic, percept-driven default process and a subsequent perceiver-driven reflective process. One key trigger for reflective processing is stimulus complexity. Moreover, if meaning can be derived from such complexity, then this can engender increased interest and elevated liking. Experiment 1 involved graffiti street-art images, pre-normed to elicit low, moderate and high levels of interest. Subjective reports indicated a predicted enhancement in liking across increasing interest levels. Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings during image viewing revealed different patterns of alpha power in temporal brain regions across interest levels. Experiment 2 enforced a brief initial image-viewing stage and a subsequent reflective image-viewing stage. Differences in alpha power arose in most EEG channels between the initial and deliberative viewing stages. A linear increase in aesthetic liking was again seen across interest levels, with different patterns of alpha activity in temporal and occipital regions across these levels. Overall, the phenomenological data support the PIA Model, while the physiological data suggest that enhanced aesthetic liking might be associated with “flow-feelings” indexed by alpha activity in brain regions linked to visual attention and reducing distraction.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference105 articles.

1. American clinical neurophysiology society guideline 2;Acharya;Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,2016

2. Bird’s-eye view of cue integration: Exposing instructional and task design factors which bias problem solvers;Ackerman;Educational Psychology Review,2023

3. Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning;Ackerman;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2017

4. Ball, Linden J., and Thompson, Valerie A. (2018). The Routledge International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Routledge.

5. Power spectrum analysis of EEG signals for estimating visual attention;Ahirwal;International Journal of Computer Applications,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Grounding Cognition in Perceptual Experience;Journal of Intelligence;2024-07-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3