The Impact of Prompts and Feedback on the Performance during Multi-Session Self-Regulated Learning in the Hypermedia Environment

Author:

Wang Yurou12,Zhang Haobo34,Wang Jue12,Ma Xiaofeng12

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

2. Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health, Lanzhou 730070, China

3. Sleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

4. Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Abstract

The hypermedia environment is among the most prevalent contemporary self-regulated learning (SRL) environments; however, methods for improving the effectiveness of students’ multi-session SRL in such environments remain under discussion. In this study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether and how prompts and feedback benefit performance during multi-session SRL in a hypermedia learning environment. A total of 76 senior students participated in Experiment 1, which used a mixed 2 (prompting condition: prompt, no prompt) × 2 (feedback condition: feedback, no feedback) × 2 (learning session: Session 1 and Session 2) design to explore the effects of prompting and feedback on the multi-session learning process in a hypermedia environment. The results indicated that, in learning Session 1, performance in the prompt condition was significantly better than in the unprompted condition, with or without feedback; in learning Session 2, participants in the prompt condition with feedback performed significantly better than those in the other three conditions. Students in the group with a prompt and feedback had the most accurate meta-comprehension absolute accuracy in both learning sessions. Experiment 2 recruited 94 secondary school students to further explore whether the combination of prompts and different types of feedback led to different learning outcomes according to the division of feedback timing. A mixed 2 (prompt condition: prompt, no prompt) × 3 (feedback condition: delayed feedback, immediate feedback, no feedback) × 2 (learning session: Session 1 and Session 2) design was used. The results indicated that, in learning Session 1, the prompt condition outperformed the unprompted condition with or without feedback; in learning Session 2, students with prompted delayed feedback outperformed the other five conditions. We also found that although there was no significant difference in meta-comprehension monitoring accuracy between delayed and immediate feedback, both groups performed significantly better than those in the no feedback condition. These results suggest that the combination of prompts and feedback in hypermedia environments facilitates student performance better than prompts or feedback alone; this improvement may be related to the correction of poor internal student feedback.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

key scientific research project for Double World-Class Initiative in Gansu Province

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference39 articles.

1. A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction;Azevedo;Journal of Educational Computing Research,1995

2. Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia;Azevedo;Psychological Testing and Assessment Modeling,2011

3. Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts;Bannert;International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies,2013

4. Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts;Bannert;Instructional Science,2012

5. Short-and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance;Bannert;Computers in Human Behavior,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Enhancing Classroom Learning Outcomes: The Power of Immediate Feedback Strategy;International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences;2023-10-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3