Environmental Factors for the Advancement of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Professional Development

Author:

Saglam Mehmet Hilmi1ORCID,Goktenturk Talha12,Demir Ibrahim3,Yazıcı Emre2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

2. Faculty of Education, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Turkey

3. Faculty of Science, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Turkey

Abstract

There is a shifting paradigm in gifted education from person-based approaches (i.e., identifying giftedness) to process-based approaches (i.e., transacting giftedness). This new framework is centered on enriching educational opportunities that will make the process meaningful (i.e., gifted) to everyone in a setting. However, little is known about how this renewed perspective can be applied in teacher professional development. In line with the socio-ecological models, our study aims to identify the best appropriate model to describe teacher self-efficacy (i.e., the dependent variable in the study) as professional development from an ecological perspective and to propose an ecologically intelligent school (EIS) for the advancement of self-efficacy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to create a model using TALIS 2018 dataset. Afterward, indices of goodness-of-fit criteria were examined for each model. The results indicate that there is a complex ecological background, in that various factors affect the dependent variable. Model 3 was determined as the most suitable model that can be proposed as an ecologically intelligent school (EIS) for the advancement of self-efficacy. The factors within the three layers of the socio-ecological model—communication with teachers, communication with students, school climate, and feeling valued by the national level—altogether created an appropriate model explaining teacher professional development, regarding self-efficacy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference87 articles.

1. Ainley, John, and Carstens, Ralph (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework, OECD Publishing. OECD Education Working Papers 187. OECD Education Working Papers.

2. Asbury, Kathryn, and Kim, Lisa E. (2020). ‘Lazy, Lazy Teachers’: Teachers’ Perceptions of How Their Profession Is Valued by Society, Policymakers, and the Media during COVID-19, University of York. Preprint.

3. Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory;Bandura;American Psychologist,1989

4. Self Eflicacy. The Exercise of Control, New York: WH;Bandura;Freeman & Co. Student Success,1997

5. Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective;Bandura;Annual Review of Psychology,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3