Race: How the Post-Genomic Era Has Unmasked a Misconception Promoted by Healthcare

Author:

Schaare Donna1ORCID,Abenavoli Ludovico2ORCID,Boccuto Luigi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ph.D. Program in Healthcare Genetics and Genomics, School of Nursing, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

2. Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Graecia”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

Abstract

The term “race” has been employed to categorize human beings into distinct groups based on some perceived biological distinctions. This concept was debunked with the completion of the Human Genome Project and its revolutionary findings that all humans are >99% genetically identical, subsequently making the term “race” obsolete. Unfortunately, the previous misconception is being propagated by the continued use of the term to capture demographic information in healthcare in an attempt to improve equity. This paper seeks to review the history of the term “race”, analyze the current policy, and discuss its limitations. It is important to note that our analysis was exclusively focused on the United States healthcare system and the Affordable Care Act; as such, it may not reflect other regions’ policies, including those in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. However, we feel that this policy analysis may serve as a model to recommend alterations that mirror the post-genomic era. The need for this policy change was recently highlighted in the 2022 ASHG presidential address, One Human Race: Billions of Genomes, and will reflect the knowledge gleaned by the scientific community through the conclusions of the Human Genome Project.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Conceptualizing and Categorizing Race and Ethnicity in Health Services Research;Ford;Health Serv. Res.,2005

2. Chou, V. (2022, February 27). How Science and Genetics are Reshaping the Race Debate of the 21st Century. Science in the News. Available online: https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/.

3. Genetics and Identity;Donovan;Sci. Educ.,2020

4. Race and genetics versus ‘race’ in genetics: A systematic review of the use of African ancestry in genetic studies;Duello;Evol. Med. Public Health,2021

5. Goodman, A. (2022, February 27). Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic. Discover Magazine. Available online: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/race-is-real-but-its-not-genetic.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3