Survey on Machine Learning Biases and Mitigation Techniques

Author:

Siddique Sunzida1,Haque Mohd Ariful2,George Roy2,Gupta Kishor Datta2ORCID,Gupta Debashis3,Faruk Md Jobair Hossain4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of CSE, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh

2. Department of Computer and Information Science, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA

3. Computer Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA

4. New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY 11545, USA

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has become increasingly prevalent in various domains. However, ML algorithms sometimes give unfair outcomes and discrimination against certain groups. Thereby, bias occurs when our results produce a decision that is systematically incorrect. At various phases of the ML pipeline, such as data collection, pre-processing, model selection, and evaluation, these biases appear. Bias reduction methods for ML have been suggested using a variety of techniques. By changing the data or the model itself, adding more fairness constraints, or both, these methods try to lessen bias. The best technique relies on the particular context and application because each technique has advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, in this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias mitigation techniques in machine learning (ML) with a focus on in-depth exploration of methods, including adversarial training. We examine the diverse types of bias that can afflict ML systems, elucidate current research trends, and address future challenges. Our discussion encompasses a detailed analysis of pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing methods, including their respective pros and cons. Moreover, we go beyond qualitative assessments by quantifying the strategies for bias reduction and providing empirical evidence and performance metrics. This paper serves as an invaluable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to navigate the intricate landscape of bias in ML, offering both a profound understanding of the issue and actionable insights for responsible and effective bias mitigation.

Funder

NSF

DOEd

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference101 articles.

1. Overcoming the pitfalls and perils of algorithms: A classification of machine learning biases and mitigation methods;Herhausen;J. Bus. Res.,2022

2. Abay, A., Zhou, Y., Baracaldo, N., Rajamoni, S., Chuba, E., and Ludwig, H. (2020). Mitigating bias in federated learning. arXiv.

3. Hort, M., Chen, Z., Zhang, J.M., Sarro, F., and Harman, M. (2022). Bia mitigation for machine learning classifiers: A comprehensive survey. arXiv.

4. Krco, N., Laugel, T., Loubes, J.M., and Detyniecki, M. (2023). When Mitigating Bias is Unfair: A Comprehensive Study on the Impact of Bias Mitigation Algorithms. arXiv.

5. Dietterich, T.G., and Kong, E.B. (1995). Machine Learning Bias, Statistical Bias, and Statistical Variance of Decision Tree Algorithms, Citeseer. Technical Report.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3