Author:
Park Chan Young,Jung Wooyong,Han Seung H.
Abstract
Many international public–private partnership projects have suffered from frequent project pending status or failure because of dissimilar interests among stakeholders over projects’ long development period. Thus, this study compares the perception gaps of 27 risks between Korean construction investors and Korean financial investors depending on different development phases of international public–private partnership projects. In the project selection phase, construction investors and financial investors show few risk perception gaps. However, in the bid and proposal phase, they perceive many risks differently: construction investors tend to perceive the construction risk and financial risk as more important, whereas financial investors perceive stakeholder risk and country risk as more significant. This study also discusses the causes of risk perception gaps from three perspectives: (1) time-dependent risk; (2) risk exposure period; (3) risk transfer and responsibility. These findings will be helpful in recognizing the dynamic risk perception gaps between two leading investors for the sustainable development and investment of international PPP projects.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference76 articles.
1. World Bank Private Participation in Infrastructure Databasehttps://ppi.worldbank.org
2. Hazard Analysis on Public–Private Partnership Projects in Developing Asia;Lee,2018
3. History RePPPeated: How Public Private Partnerships are Failing;Romero,2018
4. Why PPP Modeled Infrastructure Projects Failed:A Critical Review with a Special Focus on Road Sector
5. Critical Success Factors for PPPs in Infrastructure Developments: Chinese Perspective
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献