Abstract
Increasingly, business-to-consumer companies engage in corporate social advocacy (CSA) to respond to growing pressures from stakeholders. CSA studies are quickly accumulating, yet in-depth explanations of when and why the public expect companies to take a stance (sometimes even action) on controversial issues remain scarce. To fill these gaps, we unpack how Generation Z audiences expect companies to act on public agendas and their reasoning process through a mixed-method analysis of an exploratory survey (N = 388) conducted at a public university. The results show major changes in CSA expectations and illuminate the reasoning behind them. The results highlight a critical need to further understand CSA from audience perceptions and inform message design and testing guided by audience-centric models.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference69 articles.
1. Corporate Social Advocacy as Public Interest Communications: Exploring Perceptions of Corporate Involvement in Controversial Social-Political Issues
2. Kantar. Consumers Want Brands to Take Stance on Social Issues, but Demographic Divides Remainhttps://www.marketingdive.com/news/kantar-consumers-want-brands-to-take-stance-on-social-issues-but-demograp/579618/
3. Delta, Coke Face Boycott Campaigns over New Georgia Voting Law. The Atlanta Journal-Constitutionhttps://www.ajc.com/news/business/delta-coke-face-boycott-campaigns-over-new-georgia-voting-law/ZJUGGDO3HBA3BF2J64WVOQ5YE4/
4. Examining the Case of DICK’s Sporting Goods: Realignment of Stakeholders through Corporate Social Advocacy
5. Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献