Childhood Outcomes in Children with and without Cardiac Echogenic Foci: An Electronic Birth Cohort Study in Wales, UK

Author:

Hurt Lisa1ORCID,Uzun Orhan2,Morris Susan2,Bethel Jackie1,Evans Annette3,Seaborne Michael4,Daniel Rhian1,Brophy Sinead4ORCID,Paranjothy Shantini56

Affiliation:

1. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK

2. University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK

3. Research and Evaluation Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK

4. Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

5. Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

6. Public Health Directorate, NHS Grampian, Summerfield House, 2 Eday Road, Aberdeen AB15 6RE, UK

Abstract

There is uncertainty about outcomes associated with cardiac echogenic foci (CEF) seen at the midtrimester ultrasound scan because of limited population-based follow-up data. This can lead to unnecessary invasive testing and significant parental anxiety. We analysed data from a cohort study, The Welsh Study of Mothers and Babies, to examine whether children with CEF had more adverse outcomes during childhood compared with children without CEF. Children born between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2011 were followed until 31 January 2018, migration out of Wales, or death. The primary outcome was cardiac hospital admissions, defined a priori by an expert steering group. Secondary outcomes included congenital cardiac anomalies, and hospital admissions for other causes. There was no evidence of an association between isolated CEF and cardiac hospital admissions (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–2.25, p value 0.768), or with congenital cardiac anomalies. There was a small increased risk of a respiratory admission with isolated CEF (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.04–1.54, p value 0.020). Further research is needed on features of CEF, such as location or number, to fully understand the clinical significance of these findings.

Funder

British Heart Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference40 articles.

1. Epidemiology of multiple congenital anomalies in Europe: A EUROCAT population-based registry study;Calzolari;Birth Defects Res. Part A: Clin. Mol. Teratol.,2014

2. British Heart Foundation (2015). BHF/Oxford University Analysis of EUROCAT Congenital Anomaly Registers 2010-14, British Heart Foundation.

3. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Konings;J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,2011

4. The changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease;Zomer;Nat. Rev. Cardiol.,2011

5. Prenatal screening for structural congenital heart disease;Hunter;Nat. Rev. Cardiol.,2014

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3