Surveys and Diaries and Scales, Oh My! A Critical Analysis of Household Food Waste Measurement

Author:

Aitken John A.1ORCID,Sprenger Amber1,Alaybek Balca1,Mika Grace1,Hartman Halene1,Leets Laura1ORCID,Maese Ellyn2,Davoodi Telli2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The MITRE Corporation, 7515 Colshire Drive, McLean, VA 22102, USA

2. Gallup, 901 F St NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA

Abstract

Household food waste is a significant problem in America that can only be addressed through accurate measurement. However, there are many different measurement methods that each have advantages and disadvantages: subjective measures (i.e., recall, visual estimation) are easier to implement via surveys but can be biased, and objective measures (i.e., scales) can be precise but logistically burdensome. In this study, we collected survey and daily diary data on household food waste from 257 individuals to evaluate the extent to which a survey-based subjective recall measure, a diary-based objective scale measure, and a diary-based subjective estimation measure demonstrate convergent validity or concordance. We found evidence of substantial overlap across measures (r = 0.41 to 0.70), suggesting that there is convergent validity across these household food waste measures. Furthermore, we found that a substantial portion of variance in household food waste is attributable to within-household sources over time, demonstrating the as-of-yet overlooked need to examine predictors of food waste at between- (stable) and within-household (dynamic) levels. We discuss the further implications of these results and future research directions.

Funder

The MITRE Corporation Independent Research and Development Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference61 articles.

1. A picture says it all? The validity of photograph coding to assess household food waste;Food Qual. Prefer.,2019

2. Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland;Beretta;Waste Manag.,2012

3. Opening the black box of food waste reduction;Garrone;Food Policy,2014

4. Lundqvist, J., de Fraiture, C., and Molden, D. (2008). Saving Water: From Field to Fork—Curbing Losses and Wastage in the Food Chain, SIWI. SIWI Policy Brief.

5. The Climate Change and Economic Impacts of Food Waste in the United States;Venkat;CleanMetrics Corp.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3