Trends of Medicinal Plant Use over the Last 2000 Years in Central Europe

Author:

Dal Cero Maja,Saller Reinhard,Leonti MarcoORCID,Weckerle Caroline S.ORCID

Abstract

Medicinal plant knowledge in Central Europe can be traced back from the present to antiquity, through written sources. Approximately 100 medicinal plant taxa have a history of continuous use. In this paper, we focus on use patterns over time and the link between historical and traditional uses with the current scientific evidence. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of changing eras and medicinal concepts. Based on use-records from totally 16 historical, popular and scientific herbals, we analyze how use categories of 102 medicinal plant taxa developed over time. Overall, 56 of the 102 taxa maintained continuous use throughout all time periods. For approximately 30% of the continuous uses, scientific evidence supporting their use exists, compared to 11% for recently added uses and 6% for discontinuous uses. Dermatology and gastroenterology are use categories that are relevant across all time periods. They are associated with a high diversity of medicinal taxa and continuously used medicinal species with scientific evidence. Antidotes, apotropaic (protective) magic, and humoral detoxification were important use categories in the past. New applications reflecting biomedical progress and epidemiological challenges are cardiovascular and tonic uses. Changes in medicinal concepts are mirrored in plant use and specifically in changes in the importance of use categories. Our finding supports the concept of social validation of plant uses, i.e., the assumption that longstanding use practice and tradition may suggest efficacy and safety.

Funder

Stiftung für Komplementärmedizin

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference91 articles.

1. From cumulative cultural transmission to evidence-based medicine: Evolution of medicinal plant knowledge in Southern Italy;Leonti;Front. Pharmacol.,2015

2. The causal dependence of present plant knowledge on herbals–Contemporary medicinal plant use in Campania (Italy) compared to Matthioli (1568);Leonti;J. Ethnopharmacol.,2010

3. Die Kräutermedizin des Renaissance-Arztes Tabernaemontanus (16. Jh.) und Phytotherapie heute—Was ist geblieben, was hat sich verändert?;Clair;Schweiz. Z. Ganzheitsmed.,2011

4. Are the Correct Herbal Claims by Hildegard von Bingen Only Lucky Strikes? A New Statistical Approach;Uehleke;Complement. Med. Res.,2012

5. Mayer-Nicolai, C. (2008). Vergleich der Durch die Historischen Autoren Hildegard von Bingen und Leonhart Fuchs Pflanzlichen Arzneimitteln Zugeschriebenen mit Aktuell Anerkannten Indikationen, Universität Würzburg. Available online: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-33967.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3