Abstract
AbstractIn answer to the debate question "Is ethnobiology romanticizing traditional practices, posing an urgent need for more experimental studies evaluating local knowledge systems?" I suggest to follow-up on field study results adopting an inclusive research agenda, and challenge descriptive data, theories, and hypotheses by means of experiments. Traditional and local knowledge are generally associated with positive societal values by ethnobiologists and, increasingly also by stakeholders. They are seen as a way for improving local livelihoods, biocultural diversity conservation and for promoting sustainable development. Therefore, it is argued that such knowledge needs to be documented, protected, conserved in situ, and investigated by hypothesis testing. Here I argue that a critical mindset is needed when assessing any kind of knowledge, whether it is modern, local, indigenous, or traditional.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Diamond J. Guns, Germs, and Steel. The Fates of Human Societies. New York/London: W.W. Norton and Company; 2005.
2. Mesoudi A, Whiten A. The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1509):3489–501.
3. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
4. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology—qualitative and quantitative approaches. Chapter 5: Research design: experiments and experimental thinking. New York: Altamira Press; 2006.
5. Lakatos I. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.