Selecting Geological Formations for CO2 Storage: A Comparative Rating System

Author:

Rasool Muhammad Hammad1ORCID,Ahmad Maqsood1ORCID,Ayoub Muhammad2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Petroleum Geosciences Department, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia

2. Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia

Abstract

Underground storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) in geological formations plays a vital role in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. It involves capturing CO2 emissions from industrial processes and power generation and storing them underground, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions and curbing the impact of climate change. This review paper features a comparative analysis of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers, depleted reservoirs, coal seams, basaltic formations and clastic formations. The comparison has been drawn based upon seven factors carefully selected from the literature, i.e., safety, storage capacity, injection rates, efficiency, residual trapping, containment and integrity and potential to improve, and all of these factors have been rated from low (1) to high (5) based upon their individual traits. Based upon these factors, an overall M.H. rating system has been developed to categorize geological formations for CO2 storage and it is observed that deep water aquifers and basaltic formations are the most effective options for CO2 storage. Lastly, a detailed way forward has been suggested, which can help researchers and policymakers to find more viable ways to enhance the efficiency of CO2 storage in various geological formations.

Funder

YUTP

International Collaborative Fund—ICRF UTP—Kyutech

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference209 articles.

1. Solomon, S. (2023, March 11). IPCC (2007): Climate Change the Physical Science Basis. Available online: https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faqs.html#:~:text=When%20referencing%20the%20group%20of,Qin%2C%20M.

2. Emissions from tropical hydropower and the IPCC;Fearnside;Environ. Sci. Policy,2015

3. Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report;Robinson;Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change,2020

4. Eggleston, H., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K. (2023, March 11). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Available online: https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20880391.

5. Carbon capture and storage update;Abanades;Energy Environ. Sci.,2014

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3