Why Does the Ensemble Mean of CMIP6 Models Simulate Arctic Temperature More Accurately Than Global Temperature?

Author:

Chylek Petr1,Folland Chris K.234ORCID,Klett James D.5,Wang Muyin67ORCID,Lesins Glen8,Dubey Manvendra K.1

Affiliation:

1. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA

2. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden

4. Centre for Applied Climate Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia

5. PAR Associates, Las Cruces, NM 87545, USA

6. Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA

7. Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA 98105, USA

8. Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4J5, Canada

Abstract

An accurate simulation and projection of future warming are needed for a proper policy response to expected climate change. We examine the simulations of the mean global and Arctic surface air temperatures by the CMIP6 (Climate Models Intercomparison Project phase 6) climate models. Most models overestimate the observed mean global warming. Only seven out of 19 models considered simulate global warming that is within ±15% of the observed warming between the average of the 2014–2023 and 1961–1990 reference period. Ten models overestimate global warming by more than 15% and only one of the models underestimates it by more than 15%. Arctic warming is simulated by the CMIP6 climate models much better than the mean global warming. The reason is an equal spread of over and underestimates of Arctic warming by the models, while most of the models overestimate the mean global warming. Eight models are within ±15% of the observed Arctic warming. Only three models are accurate within ±15% for both mean global and Arctic temperature simulations.

Funder

Arctic Research Program of the NOAA Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing (GOMO) office

Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3