Determining an Optimal Oxygen Saturation Target Range Based on Neonatal Maturity: Demonstration of a Decision Tree Analytic

Author:

Bachman Thomas E.1,Iyer Narayan P.2,Newth Christopher J. L.2ORCID,LeMoyne Robert1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic

2. Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA

Abstract

The utility of decision tree machine learning in exploring the interactions among the SpO2 target range, neonatal maturity, and oxemic-risk is demonstrated. METHODS: This observational study used 3 years of paired age-SpO2-PaO2 data from a neonatal ICU. The CHAID decision tree method was used to explore the interaction of postmenstrual age (PMA) on the risk of extreme arterial oxygen levels at six different potential SpO2 target ranges (88–92%, 89–93%, 90–94%, 91–95%, 92–96% and 93–97%). Risk was calculated using a severity-weighted average of arterial oxygen outside the normal range for neonates (50–80 mmHg). RESULTS: In total, 7500 paired data points within the potential target range envelope were analyzed. The two lowest target ranges were associated with the highest risk, and the ranges of 91–95% and 92–96% were associated with the lowest risk. There were shifts in the risk associated with PMA. All the target ranges showed the lowest risk at ≥42 weeks PMA. The lowest risk for preterm infants was within a target range of 92–96% with a PMA of ≤34 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of decision tree analytics. These results suggest that SpO2 target ranges that are different from typical range might reduce morbidity and mortality. Further research, including prospective randomized trials, is warranted.

Funder

Czech Technical University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3