WHO/ICC Classification for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes Performs Better for Subtype Cytomorphological Diagnosis?

Author:

Vicente Ana Isabel12,Luna Irene12,Ruiz Juan Carlos3,Remigia María José4,Jerez Andrés5ORCID,Lluch Rafael6ORCID,Llopis Inmaculada6,Marco María Josefa7,Benet Carmen8,Alonso Carmen8,Linares María Dolores9,Serrano Luis9,Orero María Teresa10,Ortuño Francisco José5,Senent María Leonor1211

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain

2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain

3. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain

4. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, 46010 Valencia, Spain

5. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, 30008 Murcia, Spain

6. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Valencia, Spain

7. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, 46017 Valencia, Spain

8. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, 46015 Valencia, Spain

9. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, 12004 Castelló de la Plana, Spain

10. Servicio de Hematología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, 46014 Valencia, Spain

11. CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

The International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) have refined the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Both classifications segregate MDS subtypes based on molecular or cytogenetic findings but rely on the subjective assessment of blast cell percentage and dysplasia in hematopoietic cell lineages. This study aimed to evaluate interobserver concordance among 13 cytomorphologists from eight hospitals in assessing blast percentages and dysplastic features in 44 MDS patients. The study found fair interobserver agreement for the PB blast percentage and moderate agreement for the BM blast percentage, with the best concordance in cases with <5% BM blasts and >10% BM blasts. Monocyte count agreement was fair, and dysplasia assessment showed moderate concordance for megakaryocytic lineage but lower concordance for erythroid and granulocytic lineages. Overall, interobserver concordance for MDS subtypes was moderate across all classifications, with slightly better results for WHO 2022. These findings highlight the ongoing need for morphological evaluation in MDS diagnosis despite advances in genetic and molecular techniques. The study supports the blast percentage ranges established by the ICC but suggests refining BM blast cutoffs. Given the moderate interobserver concordance, a unified classification approach for MDS is recommended.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3