Performance Evaluation of Different Object Detection Models for the Segmentation of Optical Cups and Discs

Author:

Alfonso-Francia GendryORCID,Pedraza-Ortega Jesus CarlosORCID,Badillo-Fernández Mariana,Toledano-Ayala Manuel,Aceves-Fernandez Marco AntonioORCID,Rodriguez-Resendiz JuvenalORCID,Ko Seok-BumORCID,Tovar-Arriaga SaulORCID

Abstract

Glaucoma is an eye disease that gradually deteriorates vision. Much research focuses on extracting information from the optic disc and optic cup, the structure used for measuring the cup-to-disc ratio. These structures are commonly segmented with deeplearning techniques, primarily using Encoder–Decoder models, which are hard to train and time-consuming. Object detection models using convolutional neural networks can extract features from fundus retinal images with good precision. However, the superiority of one model over another for a specific task is still being determined. The main goal of our approach is to compare object detection model performance to automate segment cups and discs on fundus images. This study brings the novelty of seeing the behavior of different object detection models in the detection and segmentation of the disc and the optical cup (Mask R-CNN, MS R-CNN, CARAFE, Cascade Mask R-CNN, GCNet, SOLO, Point_Rend), evaluated on Retinal Fundus Images for Glaucoma Analysis (REFUGE), and G1020 datasets. Reported metrics were Average Precision (AP), F1-score, IoU, and AUCPR. Several models achieved the highest AP with a perfect 1.000 when the threshold for IoU was set up at 0.50 on REFUGE, and the lowest was Cascade Mask R-CNN with an AP of 0.997. On the G1020 dataset, the best model was Point_Rend with an AP of 0.956, and the worst was SOLO with 0.906. It was concluded that the methods reviewed achieved excellent performance with high precision and recall values, showing efficiency and effectiveness. The problem of how many images are needed was addressed with an initial value of 100, with excellent results. Data augmentation, multi-scale handling, and anchor box size brought improvements. The capability to translate knowledge from one database to another shows promising results too.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference62 articles.

1. World Health Organisation (2019). World Report on Vision, World Health Organisation.

2. Giaconi, J.A., Law, S.K., Coleman, A.L., Caprioli, J., and Nouri-Mahdavi, K. (2016). Pearls of Glaucoma Management, Springer. [2nd ed.].

3. Swathy, R.V. (2017). A Survey on Glaucoma Detection Methods. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res., 3.

4. Kanski, J.J., and Bowling, B. (2015). Kanski’s Clinical Ophthalmology E-Book: A Systematic Approach, Elsevier Health Sciences.

5. Retinal Imaging and Image Analysis;Abramoff;IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3