Tactical Knowledge by Decision Making and Motor Efficiency of Young Football Players in Different Playing Positions during a Three-a-Side Small-Sided Game

Author:

Matos Rui1,Moreira Carlos12,Alves Emília134,Teixeira José Eduardo567ORCID,Rodrigues Filipe89ORCID,Monteiro Diogo78ORCID,Antunes Raul89ORCID,Forte Pedro1357ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sport, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, 4560-708 Penafiel, Portugal

2. Department of Sports Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal

3. CI-ISCE, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, 4560-708 Penafiel, Portugal

4. Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health, and Leisure, CIAFEL, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

5. Department of Sport Science, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal

6. Department of Sport Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Guarda, 6300-559 Guarda, Portugal

7. Research Center in Sports, Health, and Human Development, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal

8. ESECS- Polytechnic of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal

9. Life Quality Research Center, 2040-413 Leiria, Portugal

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the tactical knowledge of young football players in different playing positions during a three-a-side small-sided game (SSG). Observational data was collected from 71 players (M = 12.16; SD = 1.55 years): 11 goalkeepers, 22 defenders, 15 midfielders, and 23 forwards. In total, 4 min of three-a-side SSGs (GR + 3 vs. 3 + GR) were recorded to assess tactical performance using a digital camera (GoPro Hero 6® version 02.01). The SSGs were performed on a field with a constant area (36 × 27 m). Video analyses were performed using LongoMatch® version 1.5.9 to record football performance; we then assessed tactical performance by using the Football Tactical Assessment System (Fut-Sat). This instrument evaluates the average of well-defined action indexes for each game in decision making principle and motor skills, specifically: (i) Decision Making Index (DMI); (ii) Motor Effectiveness Index (MEI); (iii) Effectiveness Index (I). The indexes were calculated by the ratio between the correct actions and the total. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate differences between playing positions. The results showed that tactical performance by principles seems to be significantly different according to playing position. Differences were found between defenders and forwards (H = −11.92; p = 0.03) and defenders and midfielders (H = −16.13; p = 0.01) in contention principle. In conclusion, tactical knowledge of training based on the principles of the game can help coaches and players better understand and predict each player’s actions during the game.

Funder

Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, IP

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Determining the influence of dynamic balance in the technical training in football game at U13 level;Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports;2023-10-30

2. ALTYAPI FUTBOL OYUNCULARININ MEVKİLERİNE GÖRE PROBLEM ÇÖZME, DİKKAT VE MOTİVASYON DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ;Ankara Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi;2023-08-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3