Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings

Author:

Marin-Kuan Maricel1ORCID,Pagnotti Vincent2ORCID,Patin Amaury1,Moulin Julie1,Latado Helia1,Varela Jesús1,Hammel Yves-Alexis1,Gude Thomas3,Moor Heidi3ORCID,Billinton Nick4,Tate Matthew4,Behnisch Peter Alexander5ORCID,Besselink Harrie5,Burleigh-Flayer Heather2,Koster Sander1,Szabo David T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Société des Produits Nestlé SA-Nestlé Research, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland

2. PPG, Pittsburgh, PA 15275, USA

3. SQTS Swiss Quality Testing Services, 8953 Dietikon, Switzerland

4. Gentronix Limited, Alderley Park, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK

5. BioDetection Systems B.V. (BDS), 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

According to European regulations, migration from food packaging must be safe. However, currently, there is no consensus on how to evaluate its safety, especially for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). The intensive and laborious approach, involving identification and then quantification of all migrating substances followed by a toxicological evaluation, is not practical or feasible. In alignment with the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) and the European Union (EU) guidelines on packaging materials, efforts are focused on combining data from analytics, bioassays and in silico toxicology approaches for the risk assessment of packaging materials. Advancement of non-targeted screening approaches using both analytical methods and in vitro bioassays is key. A protocol was developed for the chemical and biological screening of migrants from coated metal packaging materials. This protocol includes guidance on sample preparation, migrant simulation, chemical analysis using liquid chromatography (LC-MS) and validated bioassays covering endocrine activity, genotoxicity and metabolism-related targets. An inter-laboratory study was set-up to evaluate the consistency in biological activity and analytical results generated between three independent laboratories applying the developed protocol and guidance. Coated packaging metal panels were used in this case study. In general, the inter-laboratory chemical analysis and bioassay results displayed acceptable consistency between laboratories, but technical differences led to different data interpretations (e.g., cytotoxicity, cell passages, chemical analysis). The study observations with the greatest impact on the quality of the data and ultimately resulting in discrepancies in the results are given and suggestions for improvement of the protocol are made (e.g., sample preparation, chemical analysis approaches). Finally, there was agreement on the need for an aligned protocol to be utilized by qualified laboratories for chemical and biological analyses, following best practices and guidance for packaging safety assessment of intentionally added substances (IAS) and NIAS to avoid inconsistency in data and the final interpretation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Chemical Health and Safety,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology

Reference34 articles.

1. Guidance in selecting analytical techniques for identification and quantification of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in food contact materials (FCMS);Nerin;Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess.,2022

2. The migration from the internal coatings of food cans; summary of the findings and call for more effective regulation of polymers in contact with foods: A review;Grob;Food Addit. Contam.,1999

3. European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2004). Regulation

4. (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Union., 338, 4-17.

5. Food Contamination with Organic Materials in Perspective: Packaging Materials as the Largest and Least Controlled Source? A View Focusing on the European Situation;Grob;Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.,2006

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3