Affiliation:
1. Centre for Smart Analytics, Institute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University Australia, Gippsland Campus, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia
2. Future Regions Research Centre, Institute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University Australia, Berwick Campus, Berwick, VIC 3806, Australia
Abstract
Aquatic weeds, including invasive species, are a worldwide problem. The presence of aquatic weeds poses several critical issues, such as hindering the continuous flow of water in irrigation channels and preventing the proper distribution of adequate water quantities. Therefore, effective control measures are vital for agriculture and numerous downstream industries. Numerous methods for controlling aquatic weeds have emerged over time, with herbicide application being a widely used established method of weed management, although it imposes significant environmental risks. Therefore, it is important to explore nonchemical alternative methods to control existing and emerging aquatic weeds, potentially posing fewer environmental hazards compared with conventional chemical methods. In this review, we focus on nonchemical methods, encompassing mechanical, physical, biological, and other alternative approaches. We primarily evaluated the different nonchemical control methods discussed in this review based on two main criteria: (1) efficiency in alleviating aquatic weed problems in location-specified scenarios and (2) impacts on the environment, as well as potential health and safety risks. We compared the nonchemical treatments with the UV-C-radiation-mediated aquatic weed control method, which is considered a potential novel technique. Since there is limited published literature available on the application of UV-C radiation used exclusively for aquatic weed control, our review is based on previous reports of UV-C radiation used to successfully control terrestrial weeds and algal populations. In order to compare the mechanisms involved with nonchemical weed control methods, we reviewed respective pathways leading to plant cell death, plant growth inhibition, and diminishing reemergence to justify the potential use of UV-C treatment in aquatic habitats as a viable novel source for aquatic weed control.
Reference94 articles.
1. Brinkhoff, J., Hornbuckle, J., and Barton, J.L. (2018). Assessment of Aquatic Weed in Irrigation Channels Using UAV and Satellite Imagery. Water, 10.
2. The Economic Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature;Lovell;Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev.,2016
3. The age of water scarcity: In search of a new paradigm in aquatic weed control;Vermaat;J. Aquat. Plant Manag.,2001
4. Koech, R., and Langat, P. (2018). Improving Irrigation Water Use Efficiency: A Review of Advances, Challenges and Opportunities in the Australian Context. Water, 10.
5. Survival of a submerged aquatic weed (Egeria densa) during lake drawdown within mounds of stranded vegetation;Dugdale;Lake Reserv. Manag.,2012