Farmer Perceptions of Land Cover Classification of UAS Imagery of Coffee Agroecosystems in Puerto Rico
-
Published:2024-05-16
Issue:2
Volume:4
Page:321-342
-
ISSN:2673-7086
-
Container-title:Geographies
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geographies
Author:
Klenke Gwendolyn1, Brines Shannon1, Hernandez Nayethzi1, Li Kevin1ORCID, Glancy Riley1, Cabrera Jose2, Neal Blake H.2, Adkins Kevin A.2ORCID, Schroeder Ronny3ORCID, Perfecto Ivette1
Affiliation:
1. School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 2. Department of Aeronautical Science, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL 32114, USA 3. Department of Applied Aviation Sciences, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ 86301, USA
Abstract
Highly diverse agroecosystems are increasingly of interest as the realization of farms’ invaluable ecosystem services grows. Simultaneously, there has been an increased use of uncrewed aerial systems (UASs) in remote sensing, as drones offer a finer spatial resolution and faster revisit rate than traditional satellites. With the combined utility of UASs and the attention on agroecosystems, there is an opportunity to assess UAS practicality in highly biodiverse settings. In this study, we utilized UASs to collect fine-resolution 10-band multispectral imagery of coffee agroecosystems in Puerto Rico. We created land cover maps through a pixel-based supervised classification of each farm and assembled accuracy assessments for each classification. The average overall accuracy (53.9%), though relatively low, was expected for such a diverse landscape with fine-resolution data. To bolster our understanding of the classifications, we interviewed farmers to understand their thoughts on how these maps may be best used to support their land management. After sharing imagery and land cover classifications with farmers, we found that while the prints were often a point of pride or curiosity for farmers, integrating the maps into farm management was perceived as impractical. These findings highlight that while researchers and government agencies can increasingly apply remote sensing to estimate land cover classes and ecosystem services in diverse agroecosystems, further work is needed to make these products relevant to diversified smallholder farmers.
Funder
USDA|National Institute for Food and Agriculture
Reference38 articles.
1. Solutions for a Cultivated Planet;Foley;Nature,2011 2. Altieri, M. (2009). Red Sugar, Green Deserts: Latin American Report on Monocultures and Violations of the Human Rights to Adequate Food and Housing, to Water, to Land and to Territory, FIAN International/FIAN Sweden. 3. Iverson, A.L., Gonthier, D.J., Pak, D., Ennis, K.K., Burnham, R.J., Perfecto, I., Ramos Rodriguez, M., and Vandermeer, J.H. (2019). A Multifunctional Approach for Achieving Simultaneous Biodiversity Conservation and Farmer Livelihood in Coffee Agroecosystems. Biol. Conserv., 238. 4. Tradeoffs and Synergies among Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity Conservation, and Food Production in Coffee Agroforestry;Mayorga;Front. For. Glob. Chang.,2022 5. The Way Forward: An Agroecological Perspective for Climate-Smart Agriculture;Saj;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,2017
|
|