The Benefits, Risks and Regulation of Using ChatGPT in Chinese Academia: A Content Analysis

Author:

Hung Jason1ORCID,Chen Jackson2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1SB, UK

2. Department of Sociology, The London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, UK

Abstract

Research Aims. This research project investigates what are the major benefits and risks of Chinese students using ChatGPT for academic activities. Also, the project assesses how, if applicable, should ChatGPT be regulated in Chinese academic settings in order to maintain academic integrity and ethical standards. Methodology. The collection of primary data from relevant newspaper articles serves as the foundation of this research project. Here, the content analysis is used for primary data collection. A combination of keywords [“ChatGPT” AND (“China” OR “Chinese”) AND (“students” OR “student”)] were typed on the Google news search engine on 12 April 2023. A sum of 40 newspaper articles were deemed eligible for data analysis. Both qualitative and quantitative data were extracted and analyzed. Findings. The opinion of using ChatGPT to fulfil academic responsibilities has been polarized in China. The conservative camps worry that students are using ChatGPT to commit academic cheating. However, some Chinese educators believe AI-powered technologies should be incorporated into academic learning as AI-enabled writing tools can help improve the quality of academic outputs. A major concern that Chinese educators hold, to date, is plagiarism violations by students as an act of academic cheating. Most newspaper articles presented the use of ChatGPT in Chinese academic settings neutrally. Newspaper articles published in March 2023 contained more positive and negative word(s) about the use of ChatGPT in academic learning. Conclusions. Given the benefits ChatGPT can provide and the near-infeasibility of massively ban the use of AI-powered software, more regulations should be set up in Chinese academia. Teachers have to guide students on how to fact-check the details provided by AI and add citations and references accordingly in their coursework. Moreover, teachers should guide students on how to ask AI-powered software questions systematically and creatively, in order to maximize the intellectual outputs generated from ChatGPT.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference58 articles.

1. Abdullah (2023, April 12). Students No Longer Copy: They Use ChatGPT. Available online: https://www.gizchina.com/2023/01/14/students-no-longer-copy-they-use-chatgpt/.

2. Acres, Tom (2023, April 12). Alibaba Enters AI Arms Race with ChatGPT-Like Model Named Tongyi Qianwen. Available online: https://news.sky.com/story/alibaba-enters-ai-arms-race-with-chatgpt-like-model-named-tongyi-qianwen-12854947#:~:text=Alibaba%20has%20become%20the%20latest,messaging%20and%20a%20voice%20assistant.

3. AFP News (2023, April 12). China’s Students Leap “Great Firewall” to Get Homework Help from ChatGPT. Available online: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230308-china-s-students-leap-great-firewall-to-get-homework-help-from-chatgpt.

4. Is Using ChatGPT Cheating, Plagiarism, Both, Neither, or Forward Thinking?;Anders;Patterns,2023

5. The Future of Medical Education and Research: Is ChatGPT a Blessing or Blight in Disguise?;Arif;Medical Education Online,2023

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3