Socio-Phenomenological Reflections on What Digital Death Brings and Denies in Terms of Relational Experiences to Orthodox Romanians

Author:

Toplean Adela1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Letters, University of Bucharest, Str. Edgar Quinet, nr. 5-7, Sector 1, 010017 Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Informed by Alfred Schütz’s phenomenology of social relations and its recent developments addressing online relationality, this essay reflects on the differences between online and offline death-related experiences in contemporary Romania. In Orthodox death cultures, religious, social, and familial bonds overlap. Orthodox Christianity is sceptical about body–mind separation and values unmediated liturgical communities. It is, thus, pertinent to ask what death online brings and denies in terms of experience to Romanian internet users. Some preliminary findings from our fieldwork are discussed. So far, on Romanian Facebook, three clusters of experience emerged widely: 1. A realm of belief where faith, unchallenged by digital practices, “decodes” deadly events across life-worlds; 2. Experiences of resistance and ambivalence of those who are stuck “in-between“, that is, those less competent in their traditions, yet sceptical about digital change; 3. Death experiences seem less synchronised across life-worlds for those who value electronic proximity: digital death and real death obey different rules. Historical specificity, we shall conclude, sets typified combinations of motives for what Romanians do in the proximity of death and how they do it. Digital technologies modulate the “hows” and, less notably, the “whats”.

Funder

EU-CHANSE

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference138 articles.

1. Diaconescu, Ion (2003). Despre vrăjitorie [On Witchcraft], Sofia.

2. Andreesco, Joanna, and Bacou, Mihaela (2011). Mourir à l’ombre des Carpathes [Dying in the Shadow of the Carpathian Mountains], Payot.

3. Bănică, Mirel (2014). Nevoia de Miracol. Fenomenul Pelerinajelor în România Contemporană [The Need for Miracles. The Pilgrimage Phenomenon in Contemporary Romania], Polirom.

4. Mihăliescu, Vintilă (2017). De ce este România altfel? [Why Is Romania Different?], Polirom.

5. Who Wants to Live Forever? Living, Dying and Grieving in Our Digital Society;Bassett;Social Sciences,2015

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3