Embedding Ethical Principles into AI Predictive Tools for Migration Management in Humanitarian Action

Author:

Guillén AndreaORCID,Teodoro Emma

Abstract

AI predictive tools for migration management in the humanitarian field can significantly aid humanitarian actors in augmenting their decision-making capabilities and improving the lives and well-being of migrants. However, the use of AI predictive tools for migration management also poses several risks. Making humanitarian responses more effective using AI predictive tools cannot come at the expense of jeopardizing migrants’ rights, needs, and interests. Against this backdrop, embedding AI ethical principles into AI predictive tools for migration management becomes paramount. AI ethical principles must be imbued in the design, development, and deployment stages of these AI predictive tools to mitigate risks. Current guidelines to apply AI ethical frameworks contain high-level ethical principles which are not sufficiently specified for achievement. For AI ethical principles to have real impact, they must be translated into low-level technical and organizational measures to be adopted by those designing and developing AI tools. The context-specificity of AI tools implies that different contexts raise different ethical challenges to be considered. Therefore, the problem of how to operationalize AI ethical principles in AI predictive tools for migration management in the humanitarian field remains unresolved. To this end, eight ethical requirements are presented, with their corresponding safeguards to be implemented at the design and development stages of AI predictive tools for humanitarian action, with the aim of operationalizing AI ethical principles and mitigating the inherent risks.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research

innovation programme

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference30 articles.

1. Access Now (2022, March 03). Human Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://www.accessnow.org/human-rights-matter-in-the-ai-debate-lets-make-sure-ai-does-us-more-good-than-harm/.

2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2022, March 03). Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and Determining Whether Processing Is ‘Likely to Result in a High Risk’ for the Purposes of Regulation 2016/679. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/611236/en.

3. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2022, March 03). Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612053.

4. International Migration Management in the Age of Artificial Intelligence;Beduschi;Migration Studies,2021

5. Harnessing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence for Humanitarian Action: Opportunities and Risks;Beduschi;International Review of the Red Cross,2022

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3