The Political Biases of ChatGPT

Author:

Rozado David1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Te Pūkenga—New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Hamilton 3244, New Zealand

Abstract

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest imminent commercial applications of such AI systems where they will serve as gateways to interact with technology and the accumulated body of human knowledge. The possibility of political biases embedded in these models raises concerns about their potential misusage. In this work, we report the results of administering 15 different political orientation tests (14 in English, 1 in Spanish) to a state-of-the-art Large Language Model, the popular ChatGPT from OpenAI. The results are consistent across tests; 14 of the 15 instruments diagnose ChatGPT answers to their questions as manifesting a preference for left-leaning viewpoints. When asked explicitly about its political preferences, ChatGPT often claims to hold no political opinions and to just strive to provide factual and neutral information. It is desirable that public facing artificial intelligence systems provide accurate and factual information about empirically verifiable issues, but such systems should strive for political neutrality on largely normative questions for which there is no straightforward way to empirically validate a viewpoint. Thus, ethical AI systems should present users with balanced arguments on the issue at hand and avoid claiming neutrality while displaying clear signs of political bias in their content.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference42 articles.

1. (2023, February 25). 2006 Political Ideology Selector a Free Politics Selector. Available online: http://www.selectsmart.com/plus/select.php?url=ideology.

2. Chatbots: History, Technology, and Applications;Adamopoulou;Machine Learning with Applications,2020

3. Ain, Qurat Tul, Ali, Mubashir, Riaz, Amna, Noureen, Amna, Kamran, Muhammad, Hayat, Babar, and Rehman, Aziz Ur (2017). Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 8.

4. American Enterprise Institute—AEI (blog) (2023, January 21). Are Colleges and Universities Too Liberal? What the Research Says About the Political Composition of Campuses and Campus Climate. Available online: https://www.aei.org/articles/are-colleges-and-universities-too-liberal-what-the-research-says-about-the-political-composition-of-campuses-and-campus-climate/.

5. Archive, View Author, and Get Author RSS Feed (2021, December 04). Twitter employees give to Democrats by wide margin: Data. Data Shows Twitter Employees Donate More to Democrats by Wide Margin. Available online: https://nypost.com/2021/12/04/data-shows-twitter-employees-donate-more-to-democrats-by-wide-margin/.

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3