Scoping Meta-Review of Methods Used to Assess Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices for Heart Failure

Author:

Di Bidino Rossella1ORCID,Piaggio Davide2ORCID,Andellini Martina2ORCID,Merino-Barbancho Beatriz3ORCID,Lopez-Perez Laura3ORCID,Zhu Tianhui4,Raza Zeeshan2,Ni Melody4ORCID,Morrison Andra5,Borsci Simone46ORCID,Fico Giuseppe3ORCID,Pecchia Leandro278ORCID,Iadanza Ernesto89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS—The Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), 00168 Rome, Italy

2. School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

3. Life Supporting Technologies, Photonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, School of Telecommunication Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

4. NIHR London In-Vitro Diagnostics Cooperative, Imperial College of London, London W2 1NY, UK

5. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8, Canada

6. Department of Learning, Data Analysis, and Technology, Cognition, Data and Education (CODE) Group, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands

7. School of Engineering, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy

8. International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium

9. Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are playing increasingly important roles, permeating the field of medical devices (MDs). This rapid progress has not yet been matched by the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process, which still needs to define a common methodology for assessing AI/ML-based MDs. To collect existing evidence from the literature about the methods used to assess AI-based MDs, with a specific focus on those used for the management of heart failure (HF), the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE) conducted a scoping meta-review. This manuscript presents the results of this search, which covered the period from January 1974 to October 2022. After careful independent screening, 21 reviews, mainly conducted in North America and Europe, were retained and included. Among the findings were that deep learning is the most commonly utilised method and that electronic health records and registries are among the most prevalent sources of data for AI/ML algorithms. Out of the 21 included reviews, 19 focused on risk prediction and/or the early diagnosis of HF. Furthermore, 10 reviews provided evidence of the impact on the incidence/progression of HF, and 13 on the length of stay. From an HTA perspective, the main areas requiring improvement are the quality assessment of studies on AI/ML (included in 11 out of 21 reviews) and their data sources, as well as the definition of the criteria used to assess the selection of the most appropriate AI/ML algorithm.

Funder

International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Bioengineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3