In Vitro Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Stability of Pediococcus pentosaceus Isolated from Fermented Maize and Pearl Millet for Possible Novel Chicken Probiotic Development
-
Published:2024-05-14
Issue:2
Volume:15
Page:787-805
-
ISSN:2036-7481
-
Container-title:Microbiology Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microbiology Research
Author:
Bumbie Gifty Ziema12ORCID, Abormegah Leonardo2ORCID, Asiedu Peter3ORCID, Oduro-Owusu Akua Durowaa2, Amoah Kwame Owusu2, Danso Frederick4, Bortieh Bernard Bortei2, Nkrumah Theresah2, Mohamed Taha Mohamed5ORCID, Tang Zhiru1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory for Bio-Feed and Molecular Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China 2. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Animal Research Institute, Accra 20, Ghana 3. Department of Animal Production and Health, School of Agricultural and Technology, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani 214, Ghana 4. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Oil Palm Research Institute, Kade 74, Ghana 5. Department of Animal and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
Abstract
Research has identified certain bio-based products, such as probiotics, as alternatives to antibiotics for use in animal feed. They are capable of controlling, preventing or minimizing the colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by pathogenic bacteria. To isolate Pediococcus spp. and assess its technological properties for possible probiotic development, maize and pearl millet were used. The cereals were steeped and wet milled after 48 h of fermentation. The milled cereals were kneaded into dough for 24 h, after which a 10% slurry was prepared for tenfold serial dilution to enumerate the LAB by employing pour plate techniques using MRS Agar. Based on the cell morphology of the isolated bacteria, eight isolates (four from maize and four from millet) that were selected for identification using MALDI-TOF MS showed that five were Pediococcus pentosaceus (P. pentosaceus), one was Pediococcus acidilactici, and two did not match any organism. Subsequently, the six isolates were labeled as MZ1, MZ2, MZ3, MZ4 for the maize isolate and MLT5 and MLT7 for the millet isolate. The six Pediococcus spp. were assessed in vitro for acid and bile salt tolerance, gastric juice and intestinal fluid tolerance and antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed, and the survivability rate of the strains was calculated. With regard to the mean count, there was a reduction in log10 CFU/mL under the lower pH conditions and their duration of exposure with regard to time. Among the isolates, no differences were noted at the various periods of exposure (0 h, 1 h, 2 h and 3 h) at pH 4 (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were noted at pH 3, 2 and 1 among the isolates (p < 0.05). The percentage survival of MZ4 and MLT7 at pH 1 was higher compared to the other isolates at 0 h. Significant differences were observed among the isolated at pH 2, 3 and 4 across the various periods. The mean count of the isolates in gastric juice was similar at 0 and 1 h, but significant differences were noted at 2 and 3 h, where MLT7 was highest (p < 0.05). A similar trend was observed for percentage survival. The mean count and the percentage survival of isolates under different concentrations of bile salt were similar. Significant differences were noted among isolates in both mean count and percentage survival when exposed to intestinal fluid (p < 0.05). All of the isolates were highly tolerant to the antibiotics tested and possessed antibacterial properties against the selected pathogens. The LABs proved to be good probiotic materials, according to the results obtained. However, the Pediococcus strain MLT7 proved to be the LAB of choice; therefore, its molecular identity was verified using the 16S rRNA sequence and was labeled as Pediococcus pentosaceus GT001 after it was discovered to have 100% similarity with some strains of Pediococcus pentosaceus.
Funder
Fundamental Research Funds for the National Key R&D Program of China Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing
Reference40 articles.
1. WHO (2017). Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) Report Early Implementation, World Health Organization. 2. Ohene Larbi, R., Aurelia Ofori, L., Sylverken, A.A., Ayim-Akonor, M., and Obiri-Danso, K. (2021). Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Broilers, Pigs, and Cattle in the Greater Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Int. J. Microbiol., 2021. 3. In vitro gastric survival of commercially available probiotic strains and oral dosage forms;Caillard;Int. J. Pharm.,2017 4. Survival of Bifidobacterium BB-12 microencapsulated with fullfat goat’s milk and prebiotics when exposed to simulated gastrointestinal conditions and thermal treatments;Verruck;Small Rumin. Res.,2017 5. Beneficial microbiota. Probiotics and pharmaceutical products in functional nutrition and medicine;Novik;Microb. Infect.,2020
|
|