Affiliation:
1. McWhorter School of Building Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
2. School of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
Abstract
Heritage Building Information Modeling (HBIM) is increasingly utilized to develop accurate and semantic-rich databases for the representation, preservation, and renovation of cultural heritage. A critical factor in successful HBIM delivery is the intended uses of the model, which need to be established by stakeholders at the onset of the program. Despite the greater application of Building Information Modeling (BIM) technologies to HBIM workflows, the discipline continues to lack clarity regarding information requirements from a tenant perspective. The first stage of this research was a review of 26 published HBIM case studies to extract information including HBIM workflows, level of development (LOD) models in the field, and the stakeholders’ participation in the HBIM program. The findings from the case studies conclude that most HBIM methodologies did not seek to understand the needs of assumptive stakeholders and lacked a clearly defined objective. Ten interviews with proprietors of ten different historic courthouses in the southeastern United States were also included in the study, which were used to identify the priorities of HBIM programs from a built heritage stakeholder’s standpoint. These priorities were used in conjunction with reviewed field standards to develop LOD supplement guidelines applicable for HBIM, which were then validated through a case study. The findings of this research conclude that the creation of LOD guidelines for HBIM application is both achievable and advisable, as they allow stakeholders to identify their priorities for HBIM projects. Such guidelines would assist in standardizing the HBIM discipline and disseminating its usefulness to historic building managers. This research also provides standards that allow cultural heritage stakeholders to make informed decisions about potential HBIM programs and maximize the use of resources to implement such programs. Moreover, the methodology implemented in this research offers a valuable example for future studies on HBIM guidelines and regulations.
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference71 articles.
1. BIM for Heritage Science: A Review;Pocobelli;Herit. Sci.,2018
2. (2022, December 26). National Institute of Building Sciences National BIM Standard-United States, Version 3. Available online: https://www.nationalbimstandard.org/nbims-us.
3. Kubba, S. (2017). Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].
4. Review of Built Heritage Modelling: Integration of HBIM and Other Information Techniques;Yang;J. Cult. Herit.,2020
5. Hamledari, H., Davari, S., Azar, E.R., McCabe, B., Flager, F., and Fischer, M. (2018, January 29). UAV-Enabled Site-to-BIM Automation: Aerial Robotic- and Computer Vision-Based Development of As-Built/As-Is BIMs and Quality Control. Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献