Developing a Reference Framework for Claim Management Office: A Multi-Method Approach of an International Construction Firm

Author:

Mirzaee Ali Mohammad1,Edwards David23ORCID,Thwala Wellington Didibhuku4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1469669191, Iran

2. Department of the Built Environment, Millennium Point, City Centre Campus, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B4 7XG, UK

3. Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa

4. Department of Civil Engineering, College of Science Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa

Abstract

A claim management office (CMO) is a new intra-organisation fit based on an organisational project management (OPM) approach and deals specifically with improving claim performance. However, CMOs are either misunderstood or often overlooked in construction companies, mainly due to ignorance of the OPM context but further exacerbated by a lack of real case study research on how to adopt CMOs in these organisations. To address this knowledge gap, this present study integrates organisational ambidexterity with X-inefficiency theory (due to organisation intra-firm irrational decisions when managing such claims) to generate a reference framework for the CMO by probing its implementation within an international construction firm. A multi-method approach, including a single case study (a firm which adopted a CMO) and internal and external expert panels, was used for sampling, data collection, analysis and validation of the framework. The reference framework provides new perspectives on how construction-related companies and practitioners can adopt a CMO structure, which enables them to improve claims performance by planning in three interrelated activities, viz. function-, process- and performance-based. Theoretically, findings also contribute to the X-inefficiency and organisational ambidexterity theories, specifically, how different influences among the reference framework’s elements lead to better organisational claim performance as a plausible roadmap for future work.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference101 articles.

1. Understanding relationship between risks and claims for assessing risks with project data;Kumar;Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.,2020

2. Gurgun, A.P., and Koc, K. (Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 2022). The role of contract incompleteness factors in project disputes: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., ahead-of-print.

3. Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction;Kumaraswamy;Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.,1997

4. Lessons Learned in the Use of Dispute Boards to the Settlement of Construction Service Disputes;Fitriyanti;J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr.,2022

5. Project Management Institute (PMI) (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMI® Guide), Project Management Institute. [6th ed.].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How to predict the entry mode of international construction contractor: a case-based reasoning approach;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management;2023-12-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3