Affiliation:
1. Nutritional Food Safety Research Center, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru
2. Specialized Institute, Faculty of Zootechnics, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú, Huancayo 12000, Peru
3. Science Faculty, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima 15024, Peru
Abstract
Biowaste from slaughterhouses can be recovered to benefit food security and reduce contamination potential. More than 3 billion heads of livestock are consumed worldwide, which will increase by 17% by 2028, generating more biowaste, increasing infectious agents, and causing economic losses due to circular economy principles not being applied. This work evaluated the nutritional quality of four types of biowaste from bovine slaughter which were transformed into a meal for guinea pigs (rumen content (RCM), ears (EaM), blood (BM), and cheeks (CM)) according to their chemical composition, digestible components, energy contribution, and voluntary consumption. For the animal model, adult male guinea pigs were arranged in metabolic cages for feces collection without urinary contamination. Nine guinea pigs were used in each digestibility test. First, a direct digestibility test was conducted using a meal of barley as a reference diet (RD), the indigestibility coefficient of which allowed for the estimation of the digestibility of biowaste meals through indirect calculations; for this, diets composed of 80% of the RD and 20% of the corresponding biowaste meals were evaluated. The difference method was suitable for determining the digestibility of beef biowaste using the indigestibility coefficients of the reference diet to calculate the digestibility of ingredients which could not be offered as 100% of the meal but were incorporated as 20%. The digestible protein and metabolizable energy contents of RCM, EaM, BM, and CM were 10.2% and 2853 kcal/kg, 44.5% and 3325 kcal/kg, 70.7% and 2583 kcal/kg, and 80.8% and 3386 kcal/kg, respectively. The CM and BM feeds had the highest contributions of digestible protein due to their higher nitrogen content, and the CM and EaM feeds had the highest ME contents due to their higher fat contents. The biowaste meal consumption in descending order was CM > RCM > EaM > BM, which were consumed without problems. These results are indicative that these components can be part of guinea pigs’ diets, and it is recommended to continue studies into guinea pig growth and fattening diets with different levels of these biowaste meals.
Funder
Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú
Reference62 articles.
1. Towards more sustainable animal-feed alternatives: A survey on Spanish consumers’ willingness to consume animal products fed with insects;Mustapa;Sustain. Prod. Consum.,2023
2. Reducing food insecurity in developing countries through meat production: The potential of the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus);Lammers;Renew. Agric. Food Syst.,2009
3. Controversial cuisine: A global account of the demand, supply and acceptance of “unconventional” and “exotic” meats;Cawthorn;Meat Sci.,2016
4. Guinea pig for meat production: A systematic review of factors affecting the production, carcass and meat quality;Meat Sci.,2018
5. Dalle Zotte, A., and Cullere, M. (2019). More than Beef, Pork and Chicken—The Production, Processing, and Quality Traits of Other Sources of Meat for Human Diet, Springer International Publishing.