The Effect of a Direct Fed Microbial on Liveweight and Milk Production in Dairy Cattle
Author:
Ramirez-Garzon Orlando1ORCID, Al-Alawneh John I.23ORCID, Barber David4ORCID, Liu Huanle5, Soust Martin1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Terragen Biotech, Pty Ltd., Coolum Beach, QLD 4573, Australia 2. GCP Veterinary Epidemiology Consulting, Pty Ltd., Brisbane, QLD 4069, Australia 3. School of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia 4. DairyNEXT Nutrition Consulting Services, Marburg, QLD 4346, Australia 5. Accuredit Therapeutics, Suzhou 215000, China
Abstract
This longitudinal study aimed to quantify the effects of dietary supplementation of a direct-fed microbial (DFM) consisting of three lactobacilli isolates on milk yield, milk fat and protein yields, somatic cell count (SCC), and liveweight in a single dairy herd in Australia. A total of 150 dairy cows were randomly selected based on parity and days in milk and divided into two groups: control (n = 75) and DFM treatment (n = 75). Throughout the study, the two groups of cows were housed separately in a dry lot yard, and each group had their own feeding area. For the DFM treatment group, selected cows in mid-lactation were supplemented with 10 mL/cow/day of the DFM via top dressing of the feed for the remainder of the lactation and through the dry period, extending into subsequent lactation. The control group had no supplementation. The milk yield and liveweight were recorded daily. Milk samples were collected every two months for milk component analysis (fat, protein, and somatic cell count [SCC]). The DFM-treated cows gained more liveweight across the study (19.40 kg, 95% CI 0.44 kg; 38.30 kg, p = 0.05) compared to the control cows. In the second production year, the DFM-treated cows mobilized more liveweight (−6.06 kg, 95% CI −10.49 kg; −1.61 kg, p = 0.01) and produced more milk (0.39 L/d 95% CI 0.10; 0.89, p = 0.05). Over a full lactation, DFM cows yielded at least 258 L (95% CI 252 L; 265 L) more milk than controls. No significant differences were found in fat and protein yield or SCC. This study suggests that consistent and ongoing supplementation with a Lacticaseibacillus- and Lentilactobacillus-based DFM could have a positive effect on milk production, but further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanism.
Funder
Terragen Biotech Pty Ltd.
Reference40 articles.
1. Leistikow, K.R., Beattie, R.E., and Hristova, K.R. (2022). Probiotics beyond the farm: Benefits, costs, and considerations of using antibiotic alternatives in livestock. Front. Antibiot., 11. 2. Robles-Jimenez, L.E., Aranda-Aguirre, E., Castelan-Ortega, O.A., Shettino-Bermudez, B.S., Ortiz-Salinas, R., Miranda, M., Li, X., Angeles-Hernandez, J.C., Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E., and Gonzalez-Ronquillo, M. (2022). Worldwide Traceability of Antibiotic Residues from Livestock in Wastewater and Soil: A Systematic Review. Animals, 12. 3. Mulchandani, R., Wang, Y., Gilbert, M., and Van Boeckel, T.P. (2023). Global trends in antimicrobial use in food-producing animals: 2020 to 2030. PLOS Glob. Public Health, 3. 4. Direct-fed microbial: Beneficial applications, modes of action and prospects as a safe tool for enhancing ruminant production and safeguarding health;Khan;Int. J. Pharmacol.,2016 5. Watson, R.R., Collier, R.J., and Preedy, V.R. (2017). Nutrients in Dairy and Their Implications on Health and Disease, Academic Press.
|
|