Affiliation:
1. Department of Aerospace Structures and Materials, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
2. Applied Mechanics Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics Department, University of Patras, Rio Campus, 26500 Patras, Greece
Abstract
The pursuit of more efficient transport has led engineers to develop a wide variety of aircraft configurations with the aim of reducing fuel consumption and emissions. However, these innovative designs introduce significant aeroelastic couplings that can potentially lead to structural failure. Consequently, aeroelastic analysis and optimization have become an integral part of modern aircraft design. In addition, aeroelastic testing of scaled models is a critical phase in aircraft development, requiring the accurate prediction of aeroelastic behavior during scaled model construction to reduce costs and mitigate the risks associated with full-scale flight testing. Achieving a high degree of similarity between the stiffness, mass distribution and flow field characteristics of scaled models and their full-scale counterparts is of paramount importance. However, achieving similarity is not always straightforward due to the variety of configurations of modern lightweight aircraft, as identical geometry cannot always be directly scaled down. This configuration diversity has a direct impact on the aeroelastic response, necessitating the use of computational aeroelasticity tools and optimization algorithms. This paper presents the development of an aeroelastic scaling framework using multidisciplinary optimization. Specifically, a parametric Finite Element Model (FEM) of the wing is created, incorporating the parameterization of both thickness and geometry, primarily using shell elements. Aerodynamic loads are calculated using the Doublet Lattice Method (DLM) employing twist and camber correction factors, and aeroelastic coupling is established using infinite plate splines. The aeroelastic model is then integrated within an Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm to achieve static and dynamic similarity between the scaled model and the reference wing. A notable contribution of this work is the incorporation of internal geometry parameterization into the framework, increasing its versatility and effectiveness.
Reference36 articles.
1. Andersen, G., Cowan, D., and Piatak, D. (2007, January 23–26). Aeroelastic Modeling, Analysis and Testing of a Morphing Wing Structure. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA.
2. The European Commission (2021). Reducing Emissions from Aviation, The European Commission.
3. Anderson, J.D. (2017). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, McGraw Hill Education. [6th ed.].
4. Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity of High-Aspect-Ratio-Wing Aircraft by Finite Element and Multibody Methods;Castellani;J. Aircr.,2017
5. Garrigues, E. (2018). A Review of Industrial Aeroelasticity Practices at Dassault Aviation for Military Aircraft and Business Jets. Aerospacelab J., AL14-09.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Multidisciplinary optimization methodology for truss-braced wing aircraft using high-fidelity structure sizing;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering;2024-09-10