Two Years’ Experience of Intensive Home Hemodialysis with the Physidia S3 System: Results from the RECAP Study

Author:

Fessi Hafedh1,Nicoud Philippe23,Serrato Tomas4,Gilbert Olivia5,Courivaud Cécile6,Daoud Salima7,Morena Marion8ORCID,Thomas Michel9,Canaud Bernard10ORCID,Cristol Jean-Paul58ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nephrology Department, Tenon Hospital, 75020 Paris, France

2. Dialysis Department, Aural Dialysis Center, 69008 Lyon, France

3. Emergency Department, Léman Hospital, 74200 Thonon Les Bains, France

4. Manhès Hospital Center, 91700 Fleury-Mérogis, France

5. Charles Mion Foundation, AIDER-Santé, 34090 Montpellier, France

6. Nephrology Department, University Hospital Center of Besancon, 25000 Besancon, France

7. Monitoring Force Group, 78600 Maisons-Laffitte, France

8. PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, Department of Biochemistry and Hormonology, University Hospital Center of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France

9. Physidia, 49124 Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou, France

10. Faculty of Medicine, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France

Abstract

The RECAP study reports results and outcomes (clinical performances, patient acceptance, cardiac outcomes, and technical survival) achieved with the S3 system used as an intensive home hemodialysis (HHD) platform over a three-year French multicenter study. Ninety-four dialysis patients issued from ten dialysis centers and treated more than 6 months (mean follow-up: 24 months) with S3 were included. A two-hour treatment time was maintained in 2/3 of patients to deliver 25 L of dialysis fluid, while 1/3 required up to 3 h to achieve 30 L. The additional convection volume produced by means of the SeCoHD tool (internal filtration backfiltration) was 3 L/session, and the net ultrafiltration produced to achieve dry weight was 1.4 L/session. On a weekly basis, an average 156 L of dialysate corresponding to 94 L of urea clearance when considering 85% dialysate saturation under low flow conditions was delivered. Such urea clearance was equivalent to 9.2 [8.0–13.0] mL/min weekly urea clearance and a standardized Kt/V of 2.5 [1.1–4.5]. The predialysis concentration of selected uremic markers remained remarkably stable over time. Fluid volume status and blood pressure were adequately controlled by means of a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (7.9 mL/h/kg). Technical survival on S3 was 72% and 58% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The S3 system was easily handled and kept by patients at home, as indicated by technical survival. Patient perception was improved, while treatment burden was reduced. Cardiac features (assessed in a subset of patients) tended to improve over time. Intensive hemodialysis relying on the S3 system offers a very appealing option for home treatment with quite satisfactory results, as shown in the RECAP study throughout a two-year follow-up time, and offers the best bridging solution to kidney transplantation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3