Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons

Author:

Li-Baboud Ya-Shian1ORCID,Virts Ann1,Bostelman Roger12,Yoon Soocheol13ORCID,Rahman Amaan4,Rhode Lucia4,Ahmed Nishat4,Shah Mili15

Affiliation:

1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

2. Smart HLPR LLC, Troutman, NC 28166, USA

3. Institute for Soft Matter, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA

4. Department of Electrical Engineering, Albert Nerken School of Engineering, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York, NY 10003, USA

5. Department of Mathematics, Albert Nerken School of Engineering, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York, NY 10003, USA

Abstract

In recent years, exoskeleton test methods for industrial exoskeletons have evolved to include simulated laboratory and field environments. Physiological, kinematic, and kinetic metrics, as well as subjective surveys, are used to evaluate exoskeleton usability. In particular, exoskeleton fit and usability can also impact the safety of exoskeletons and their effectiveness at reducing musculoskeletal injuries. This paper surveys the state of the art in measurement methods applied to exoskeleton evaluation. A notional classification of the metrics based on exoskeleton fit, task efficiency, comfort, mobility, and balance is proposed. In addition, the paper describes the test and measurement methods used in supporting the development of exoskeleton and exosuit evaluation methods to assess their fit, usability, and effectiveness in industrial tasks such as peg in hole, load align, and applied force. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of how the metrics can be applied towards a systematic evaluation of industrial exoskeletons, current measurement challenges, and future research directions.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

Reference97 articles.

1. (2022, December 22). Injuries, Illnesses and Fatalities. Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Resulting in Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Available online: https://www.bls.gov/iif/factsheets/msds.htm.

2. Physical and psychosocial ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in automobile manufacturing workers;Vergrift;Occup. Environ. Med.,2012

3. Yale Environmental Health and Safety (2022, December 22). Ergonomics: Awkward Posture. Available online: https://ehs.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/ergo-awkward-posture.pdf.

4. Liberty Mutual Insurance (2022, December 22). 2022 Workplace Safety Index. Available online: https://business.libertymutual.com/insights/2022-workplace-safety-index/.

5. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effec-tiveness research;Howard;Am. J. Ind. Med.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3