Assessment of Exoskeletons for Work Activities: The Dilemma behind the Product

Author:

Lefint Jérémy1,Moniz António B.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany

2. CICS.NOVA, Nova University of Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal

Abstract

The introduction of exoskeletons by many companies has often resulted in potential users not wanting to wear them. Evaluations of the exoskeleton reveal benefits of use, including ergonomic advantages and a reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. How can this contradiction be explained? By searching the available literature, we can identify the methods used to develop these devices and the methods employed to evaluate their acceptance and benefit. By looking at the product from different viewpoints and involving different disciplines, we will get to the root of this discrepancy. Our findings indicate that the product definition, development focus, and evaluation methods do not sufficiently and adequately address the primary goal of exoskeletons. The development of such devices should be prioritized not only for the delivery of support but also for the motivation of the user. Finally, we put forward the proposal to discuss the establishment of a novel development method for the prospective elaboration of exoskeletons.

Funder

Portuguese national funds through Foundation for Science and Technology

Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences of Nova University of Lisbon–CICS.NOVA

KIT

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference91 articles.

1. Borislav, M., and Tri, D. (2024, May 26). Exoskeleton Catalog. Available online: https://exoskeletonreport.com/product-category/exoskeleton-catalog/?filter_exoskeleton-category=industrial.

2. Peters, M., and Wischniewski, S. (2024, May 26). The Impact of Using Exoskeletons on Occupational Safety and Health. Dortmund, 2019. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-11/Exoskeletons%26OSH.pdf.

3. Yagn, N. (1890). Apparatus for Facilitating Walking, Running, and Jumping. (440684), U.S. Patent.

4. Makinson, B.J. (1971). Research and Development Prototype for Machine Augmentation of Human Strength and Endurance: Handiman I Project of General Electric Company Specialty Materials Handling Products Operation, National Technical Information Service.

5. Zoss, A., Kazerooni, H., and Chu, A. (2005, January 2–6). On the mechanical design of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX). Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3