Patient Engagement in Health Research: Perspectives from Patient Participants

Author:

Easley Julie1ORCID,Wassersug Richard2ORCID,Matthias Sharon3,Tompson Margaret4,Schneider Nancy D.5,O’Brien Mary Ann6,Vick Bonnie7,Fitch Margaret8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Education, Horizon Health Network, Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, 700 Priestman Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5N5, Canada

2. Department of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada

3. Matthias Inc.: Connecting for Innovation and Advancing Societies, Edmonton, AB T5K 1S5, Canada

4. Independent Researcher, Saskatoon, SK S7H 0A1, Canada

5. St. Walburg Town Hall, St. Walburg, SK S0M 2T0, Canada

6. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada

7. Independent Researcher, St. Walburg, SK S0M 2T0, Canada

8. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada

Abstract

Background and purpose: Over the past decade, patient engagement (PE) has emerged as an important way to help improve the relevance, quality, and impact of health research. However, there is limited consensus on how best to meaningfully engage patients in the research process. The goal of this article is to share our experiences and insights as members of a Patient Advisory Committee (PAC) on a large, multidisciplinary cancer research study that has spanned six years. We hope by sharing our reflections of the PAC experiences, we can highlight successes, challenges, and lessons learned to help guide PE in future health research. To the best of our knowledge, few publications describing PE experiences in health research teams have been written by patients, survivors, or family caregivers themselves. Methods: A qualitative approach was used to gather reflections from members of the Patient Advisory Committee regarding their experiences in participating in a research study over six years. Each member completed an online survey and engaged in a group discussion based on the emergent themes from the survey responses. Results: Our reflections about experiences as a PAC on a large, pan-Canadian research study include three overarching topics (1) what worked well; (2) areas for improvement; and (3) reflections on our overall contribution and impact. Overall, we found the experience positive and experienced personal satisfaction but there were areas where future improvements could be made. These areas include earlier engagement and training in the research process, more frequent communication between the patient committee and the research team, and on-going monitoring regarding the nature of the patient engagement. Conclusions: Engaging individuals who have experienced the types of events which are the focus of a research study can contribute to the overall relevance of the project. However, intentional efforts are necessary to ensure satisfactory involvement.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference31 articles.

1. Patient engagement in Canada: A scoping review of the “how” and “what” of patient engagement in health research;Manafo;Health Res. Policy. Syst.,2018

2. “Still learning and evolving in our approaches”: Patient and stakeholder engagement among Canadian community based primary health care researchers;Kendall;Res. Involv. Engagem.,2018

3. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research;Bird;Health Expect.,2020

4. An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research;Hamilton;Health Expect.,2018

5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2014). Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research: Patient Engagement Framework, Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Available online: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3