Abstract
To address the question of why corporate executives adopt diverse corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies, this conceptual paper proposes a decision-frame model to explain how differences in executives’ information-processing templates can lead to different strategic choices concerning CSR. Drawing on managerial cognition research and CSR literature, the CSR decision frame is conceptualized as a three-dimensional configuration. Each dimension depicts a continuum of responses to each of the three fundamental issues related to CSR (i.e., corporate’s objectives, corporate’s stakeholders, and leader’s responsibilities). The key premise is that the specific content and structure of a CSR decision-frame configuration define a leader’s unique stance on environmental and social issues, which, in turn, influence their sense-making process and shape CSR responses and strategies. This CSR decision-frame approach provides a process lens that highlights the cognitive mechanisms of how executives make critical CSR strategic decisions. Furthermore, this paper advances the understanding of the diversity in CSR strategy with a nuanced mental-configuration perspective: CSR means many different things to different leaders depending on the unique content and structure of his or her CSR decision frame; these varying subjective representations of CSR principles contribute to the diverse CSR responses across firms.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference86 articles.
1. Updated Statement Moves Away from Shareholder Primacy, Includes Commitment to All Stakeholders. Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to Promote ‘An Economy That Serves All Americans’
https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation-to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans
2. Shareholder Value Is No Longer Everything, Top C.E.O.s Say;Gelles;The New York Times,2019
3. On the 2019 Business Roundtable “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation”
4. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations
5. The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Ethics and Social Responsibility for 21st Century ICT;Advances in Information Quality and Management;2024-07-01