Prediction Accuracy of Soil Chemical Parameters by Field- and Laboratory-Obtained vis-NIR Spectra after External Parameter Orthogonalization
Author:
Metzger Konrad1ORCID, Liebisch Frank2ORCID, Herrera Juan M.3, Guillaume Thomas1ORCID, Bragazza Luca1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Field-Crop Systems and Plant Nutrition, Agroscope, Route de Duillier 60, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland 2. Water Protection and Substance Flows, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland 3. Cultivation Techniques and Varieties in Arable Farming, Agroscope, Route de Duillier 60, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland
Abstract
One challenge in predicting soil parameters using in situ visible and near infrared spectroscopy is the distortion of the spectra due to soil moisture. External parameter orthogonalization (EPO) is a mathematical method to remove unwanted variability from spectra. We created two different EPO correction matrices based on the difference between spectra collected in situ and, respectively, spectra collected from the same soil samples after drying and sieving and after drying, sieving and finely grinding. Spectra from 134 soil samples recorded with two different spectrometers were split into calibration and validation sets and the two EPO corrections were applied. Clay, organic carbon and total nitrogen content were predicted by partial least squares regression for uncorrected and EPO-corrected spectra using models based on the same type of spectra (“within domain”) as well as using laboratory-based models to predict in situ collected spectra (“cross-domain”). Our results show that the within-domain prediction of clay is improved with EPO corrections only for the research grade spectrometer, with no improvement for the other parameters. For the cross-domain predictions, there was a positive effect from both EPO corrections on all parameters. Overall, we also found that in situ collected spectra provided an equally successful prediction as laboratory-based spectra.
Funder
Agroscope Research Programme “Indicate-Measuring and Optimising Farm Environmental Impacts” Horizon 2020 European Joint Program (EJP) SOIL project “ProbeField”
Reference57 articles.
1. In-field soil spectroscopy in Vis–NIR range for fast and reliable soil analysis: A review;Piccini;Eur. J. Soil Sci.,2024 2. Nocita, M., Stevens, A., van Wesemael, B., Aitkenhead, M., Bachmann, M., Barthès, B., Ben Dor, E., Brown, D.J., Clairotte, M., and Csorba, A. (2015). Advances in Agronomy, Elsevier. 3. Soil spectroscopy with the use of chemometrics, machine learning and pre-processing techniques in soil diagnosis: Recent advances–A review;Barra;TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.,2021 4. Ahmadi, A., Emami, M., Daccache, A., and He, L. (2021). Soil Properties Prediction for Precision Agriculture Using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Agronomy, 11. 5. Angelopoulou, T., Balafoutis, A., Zalidis, G., and Bochtis, D. (2020). From Laboratory to Proximal Sensing Spectroscopy for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation—A Review. Sustainability, 12.
|
|