Pitfalls in Metaheuristics Solving Stoichiometric-Based Optimization Models for Metabolic Networks

Abstract

Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) is a constraint-based method that is commonly used to guide metabolites through restricting pathways that often involve conditions such as anaplerotic cycles like Calvin, reversible or irreversible reactions, and nodes where metabolic pathways branch. The method can identify the best conditions for one course but fails when dealing with the pathways of multiple metabolites of interest. Recent studies on metabolism consider it more natural to optimize several metabolites simultaneously rather than just one; moreover, they point out the use of metaheuristics as an attractive alternative that extends FBA to tackle multiple objectives. However, the literature also warns that the use of such techniques must not be wild. Instead, it must be subject to careful fine-tuning and selection processes to achieve the desired results. This work analyses the impact on the quality of the pathways built using the NSGAII and MOEA/D algorithms and several novel optimization models; it conducts a study on two case studies, the pigment biosynthesis and the node in glutamate metabolism of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris, under three culture conditions (autotrophic, heterotrophic, and mixotrophic) while optimizing for three metabolic intermediaries as independent objective functions simultaneously. The results show varying performances between NSGAII and MOEA/D, demonstrating that the selection of an optimization model can greatly affect predicted phenotypes.