Abstract
This text offers a careful description and sociological analysis of two legal innovations undertaken to govern religious diversity (in 2007 and 2019) in the neighboring Swiss cantons, Vaud and Geneva. Although the two cantons have very similar social and cultural conditions, they offer legally opposite solutions—one based on a notion of secularity implying separation, the other favoring recognition of religious diversity. The author argues that beyond an initial appreciation in terms of differences, the two cases are surprisingly similar in their logic of recognition, revealing a sense of deep suspicion towards religious diversity. Drawing on the concept of “recognition” as a multi-dimensional concept including legal, civic, and intimate/person levels and more importantly, on a Foucauldian perspective, this text concentrates on how control is involved at a practical level beyond the rhetoric of empowerment.
Reference42 articles.
1. Visibilité, transparence et commérage : de quelques conditions de possibilité de l'islamophobie... et de la citoyenneté
2. La Fracture Religieuse Vaudoise, 1847–1966. L’Église libre, “la Môme” et le canton de Vaud;Bastian,2016
3. Penser le pouvoir pastoral dans les prisons actuelles;Becci,2007
4. Vers la superdiversité religieuse: Diversité, pluralité, pluralisme et reconnaissance;Becci,2018
5. Les représentations sociales concernant la pluralisation religieuse en Suisse
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献