The Regulation of Religion through National Normative Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis between Italy and Argentina

Author:

Bossi Luca1ORCID,García Bossio María Pilar23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, 10100 Turin, Italy

2. Institute of Social Sciences Research (IICS), Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Buenos Aires C1107AFF, Argentina

3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires C1033AAJ, Argentina

Abstract

The normative framework is one of the constitutive edges of state regulation of religion. It contributes to the configuration of different forms of relations between state and religions. This can be observed in at least three areas. First, in the way the state defines religion. Second, in the way it recognises and legislates its relationship with different religions. Finally, in the rules it establishes for confessional institutions and actors at different levels of social life (education, health, prisons, etc.). In this article, we propose to comparatively analyse the national legal systems that regulate religion in Italy and Argentina, with special emphasis on the equal or differentiated treatment of different religions. The policies of recognition and integration of religious minorities find in the normative framework an empowering or limiting factor, depending on the national context. Although both countries share a dominant Catholic matrix, their historical developments and legal formats present contrasts that project different scenarios of religious governance, which we will try to elucidate.

Funder

Bilateral Cooperation Program CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina)-CUIA

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference102 articles.

1. Albisetti, Alessandro (Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale, 2012a). Le intese fantasma, Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale, Rivista telematica.

2. Albisetti, Alessandro (Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale, 2012b). Le intese fantasma (a metà), Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale, Rivista telematica.

3. Sociogénesis de los dispositivos evangélicos de “rehabilitación” de usuarios de drogas en Argentina;Algranti;Salud Colectiva,2018

4. Becci, Irene (2021). Beyond the Rhetoric of Recognition or Separation: Two Swiss Cantons’ Attempts at Governing Religious Superdiversity. Religions, 12.

5. Becci, Irene, Burchardt, Marian, and Casanova, José (2013). Topographies of Faith. Religion in Urban Spaces, Brill.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3