Human–Exoskeleton Coupling Simulation for Lifting Tasks with Shoulder, Spine, and Knee-Joint Powered Exoskeletons
-
Published:2024-07-25
Issue:8
Volume:9
Page:454
-
ISSN:2313-7673
-
Container-title:Biomimetics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biomimetics
Author:
Arefeen Asif1ORCID, Xia Ting2, Xiang Yujiang1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA
Abstract
In this study, we introduce a two-dimensional (2D) human skeletal model coupled with knee, spine, and shoulder exoskeletons. The primary purpose of this model is to predict the optimal lifting motion and provide torque support from the exoskeleton through the utilization of inverse dynamics optimization. The kinematics and dynamics of the human model are expressed using the Denavit–Hartenberg (DH) representation. The lifting optimization formulation integrates the electromechanical dynamics of the DC motors in the exoskeletons of the knee, spine, and shoulder. The design variables for this study include human joint angle profiles and exoskeleton motor current profiles. The optimization objective is to minimize the squared normalized human joint torques, subject to physical and task-specific lifting constraints. We solve this optimization problem using the gradient-based optimizer SNOPT. Our results include a comparison of predicted human joint angle profiles, joint torque profiles, and ground reaction force (GRF) profiles between lifting tasks with and without exoskeleton assistance. We also explore various combinations of exoskeletons for the knee, spine, and shoulder. By resolving the lifting optimization problems, we designed the optimal torques for the exoskeletons located at the knee, spine, and shoulder. It was found that the support from the exoskeletons substantially lowers the torque levels in human joints. Additionally, we conducted experiments only on the knee exoskeleton. Experimental data indicated that using the knee exoskeleton decreases the muscle activation peaks by 35.00%, 10.03%, 22.12%, 30.14%, 16.77%, and 25.71% for muscles of the erector spinae, latissimus dorsi, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris, respectively.
Funder
Research Jumpstart/Accelerator Grant from Oklahoma State University National Science Foundation
Reference44 articles.
1. Houtenville, A.J., Brucker, D.L., and Lauer, E.A. (2016). Annual Compendium of Disability Statistics: 2015, Institute on Disability. 2. Bai, S., and Rasmussen, J. (2011, January 4–7). Modelling of physical human-robot interaction for exoskeleton designs. Proceedings of the Multibody Dynamics 2011, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Agarwal, P., Kuo, P.H., Neptune, R.R., and Deshpande, A.D. (2013, January 24–26). A novel framework for virtual prototyping of rehabilitation exoskeletons. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Cho, K., Kim, Y., Yi, D., Jung, M., and Lee, K. (2012, January 23–25). Analysis and evaluation of a combined human-exoskeleton model under two different constraints condition. Proceedings of the International Summit on Human Simulation, St. Pete Beach, FL, USA. 5. Ramadurai, S., Jeong, H., and Kim, M. (2023). Predicting the metabolic cost of exoskeleton-assisted squatting using foot pressure features and machine learning. Front. Robot. AI, 10.
|
|