Affiliation:
1. Department of Poultry Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan
2. Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
3. Department of Animal Nutrition, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25130, Pakistan
Abstract
This study investigates the chemical composition of soyhulls (SHs) as an alternative feed ingredient and their effect on nutrient and amino acid (AA) digestibility in laying hens during peak production. A total of 200 golden brown hens (28 weeks old) were subjected to random allocation across 5 dietary treatments: a corn–soybean meal (SBM) reference diet and 4 test diets with 25% SHs from different mills (SH1, SH2, SH3, and SH4). Each treatment was replicated four times with ten birds per replicate. Digesta samples were collected during three phases (28–32, 32–36, and 36–40 weeks of age) to measure apparent metabolizable energy (AME), the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of nutrients, and the standard ileal digestibility (SID) of AAs. The SBM diet had 30.0% crude protein (CP) and 3.78% crude fiber (CF), while the SH diets had 21.0 to 21.5% CP and 11.6% CF. The findings revealed that the AME was lower (p < 0.05) with SH diets (2404 kcal/kg) compared to the SBM diet (2627 kcal/kg) in all three phases. The SH diets had a lower AID of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ash, ether extract (EE), and crude fiber (CF) than the SBM diet by an average of 2.88, 2.25, 4.93, 4.99, and 3.36%, respectively. The AID of nitrogen-free extract (NFE) was higher in the SH diets than the SBM diet by 3.42% in all three phases (p < 0.05). The SH diets had lower uric acid excretion (about 66.93 mg/100 mL) than the SBM diet (about 76.43 mg/100 mL) on average in all three phases. The SH diets had a lower SID of arginine, histidine, isoleucine, lysine, cysteine, valine, and tyrosine than the SBM diet by 2 to 10%, while the SID of methionine was higher in the SH diets than the SBM diet by 2.2% on average in all three phases (p < 0.05). The SH from Sadiq Brother Feed (SH1) had the highest AME and AID of DM, ash, CP, EE, CF, and the SID of AA among the SH diets. These results indicate that SH can partially replace SBM in laying hen diets, but the source and quality of SH should be considered.
Funder
Higher Education commission (HEC), Pakistan
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference55 articles.
1. Ajide, S., Opowoye, I., Makinde, J., Bello, Z., Bot, M., Ahmadu, A., and Adeniran, M. (2023). Poultry Farming—New Perspectives and Applications, IntechOpen.
2. Specialized Protein Products in Broiler Chicken Nutrition: A Review;Beski;Anim. Nutr.,2015
3. The Future Supply of Animal-Derived Protein for Human Consumption;Boland;Trends Food Sci. Technol.,2013
4. The Effect of Bioenergy Expansion: Food, Energy, and Environment;Popp;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2014
5. Effect of Soybean Variety on Anti-Nutritional Factors Content, and Growth Performance and Nutrients Metabolism in Rat;Gu;Int. J. Mol. Sci.,2010