Damage Location Determination with Data Augmentation of Guided Ultrasonic Wave Features and Explainable Neural Network Approach for Integrated Sensor Systems
-
Published:2024-01-24
Issue:2
Volume:13
Page:32
-
ISSN:2073-431X
-
Container-title:Computers
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Computers
Author:
Polle Christoph12ORCID, Bosse Stefan1ORCID, Herrmann Axel S.12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany 2. Faserinstitut Bremen, Am Biologischen Garten 2—Geb. IW3, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
Abstract
Machine learning techniques such as deep learning have already been successfully applied in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) for damage localization using Ultrasonic Guided Waves (UGW) at various temperatures. However, a common issue arises due to the time-consuming nature of collecting guided wave measurements at different temperatures, resulting in an insufficient amount of training data. Since SHM systems are predominantly employed in sensitive structures, there is a significant interest in utilizing methods and algorithms that are transparent and comprehensible. In this study, a method is presented to augment feature data by generating a large number of training features from a relatively limited set of measurements. In addition, robustness to environmental changes, e.g., temperature fluctuations, is improved. This is achieved by utilizing a known temperature compensation method called temperature scaling to determine the function of signal features as a function of temperature. These functions can then be used for data generation. To gain a better understanding of how the damage localization predictions are made, a known explainable neural network (XANN) architecture is employed and trained with the generated data. The trained XANN model was then used to examine and validate the artificially generated signal features and to improve the augmentation process. The presented method demonstrates a significant increase in the number of training data points. Furthermore, the use of the XANN architecture as a predictor model enables a deeper interpretation of the prediction methods employed by the network.
Funder
German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference30 articles.
1. Farrar, C., and Worden, K. (2013). Structural Health Monitoring a Machine Learning Perspective, John Wiley & Sons. 2. Choi, H., Choi, S., and Cha, H. (2008, January 17–19). Structural Health Monitoring system based on strain gauge enabled wireless sensor nodes. Proceedings of the 2008 5th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems, Kanazawa, Japan. 3. Taher, S.A., Li, J., Jeong, J.H., Laflamme, S., Jo, H., Bennett, C., Collins, W.N., and Downey, A.R.J. (2022). Structural Health Monitoring of Fatigue Cracks for Steel Bridges with Wireless Large-Area Strain Sensors. Sensors, 22. 4. Ghadarah, N., and Ayre, D. (2023). A Review on Acoustic Emission Testing for Structural Health Monitoring of Polymer-Based Composites. Sensors, 23. 5. Willberry, J.O., Papaelias, M., and Franklyn Fernando, G. (2020). Structural Health Monitoring Using Fibre Optic Acoustic Emission Sensors. Sensors, 20.
|
|