Railways Passengers Comfort Evaluation through Motion Parameters: A Systematic Review

Author:

Silva Patricia12ORCID,Ribeiro Diogo3ORCID,Mendes Joaquim45ORCID,Seabra Eurico Augusto Rodrigues2ORCID,Postolache Octavian6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CONSTRUCT—LESE, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Guimarães, Portugal

3. CONSTRUCT—LESE, School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal

4. Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal

5. Labiomep, INEGI, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal

6. Instituto de Telecomunicações, ISCTE-IUL Lisbon, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Railways are one of the most widely used mass transportation systems. Its superior transportation capacity, low environmental impact, high safety, and comfort have been leading to a continuous increase in passengers. To keep this trend going, it is crucial to improve the railways’ attractiveness and comfort levels. A rail journey’s comfort performance is rather complex, involving the analysis of multiple factors. Those raised by the vehicle motion and seat performance are the focus of vehicle designers’ concerns. Therefore, only a combination of static and dynamic comfort methodologies can accurately characterize passengers’ comfort. This work aimed to perform a systematic review concerning the comfort evaluation of train passengers. The bibliographic search yielded 62 studies on static and dynamic comfort evaluation methods. Results show a lack of experiments conducted on real rail environments, leading to weak conclusions regarding the real in-service conditions that train users face. Moreover, an investigation gap concerning the simultaneous application of both static and dynamic methodologies was observed. Therefore, more investigations are needed to evaluate and increase passengers’ comfort and promote rail usage as a daily transportation system.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

Base Funding

Programmatic Funding

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering

Reference70 articles.

1. A comparison study of ride comfort indices between Sperling’s method and EN 12299;Jiang;Int. J. Rail Transp.,2019

2. Correlation of ride comfort evaluation methods for railway vehicles;Kim;Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit,2003

3. Sitting comfort analysis and prediction for high-speed rail passengers based on statistical analysis and machine learning;Yuxue;Build. Environ.,2022

4. Editorial: Comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model;Vink;Appl. Ergon.,2012

5. Zhang, L., Helander, M., and Kumar, S. (1992). Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety IV, Taylor & Francis.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3