Affiliation:
1. Predictive Lab, Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Av. Santa María 6400, Santiago, Chile
Abstract
Jointing Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) with the Proportional Hazards Model (PHM), asset-intensive industries often monitor vital covariates to predict failure rate, the reliability function, and maintenance decisions. This analysis requires defining the transition probabilities of asset conditions evolving among states over time. When only one covariate is assessed, the model’s parameters are commonly obtained from expert opinions to provide state bands directly. However, the challenge lies within multiple covariate problems, where arbitrary judgment can be difficult and debatable, since the composite measurement does not represent any physical magnitude. In addition, selecting covariates lacks procedures to prioritize the most relevant ones. Therefore, the present work aimed to determine multiple covariate bands for the transition probability matrix via supervised classification and unsupervised clustering. We used Machine Learning (ML) to strengthen the PHM model and to complement expert knowledge. This paper allows obtaining the number of covariate bands and the optimal limits of each one when dealing with predictive maintenance decisions. This novel proposal of an ML condition assessment is a robust alternative to the expert criterion to provide accurate results, increasing the expectation of the remaining useful life for critical assets. Finally, this research has built an enriched bridge between the decision areas of predictive maintenance and Data Science.
Funder
ANID through FONDECYT DE INICIACIÓN
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering
Reference39 articles.
1. Aircraft routing with generalized maintenance constraints;Safaei;Omega,2018
2. A comparison of strategic mine planning approaches for in-pit crushing and conveying, and truck/shovel systems;Nehring;Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol.,2018
3. A decision-making framework to integrate maintenance contract conditions with critical spares management;Godoy;Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.,2014
4. Maletič, D., Maletič, M., Al-Najjar, B., and Gomišček, B. (2020). An analysis of physical asset management core practices and their influence on operational performance. Sustainability, 12.
5. Galar, D., and Kans, M. (2017, January 29–30). The impact of maintenance 4.0 and big data analytics within strategic asset management. Proceedings of the Maintenance Performance and Measurement and Management 2016 (MPMM 2016), Luleå, Sweden.