Research on the Power Output of Different Floating Wind Farms Considering the Wake Effect
-
Published:2024-08-24
Issue:9
Volume:12
Page:1475
-
ISSN:2077-1312
-
Container-title:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JMSE
Author:
Cui Jiaping1ORCID, Wu Xianyou23, Lyu Pin2, Zhao Tong1, Li Quankun1ORCID, Ma Ruixian1ORCID, Liu Yingming4
Affiliation:
1. School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China 2. Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830026, China 3. The State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China 4. School of Electrical Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China
Abstract
For floating wind turbines, one of the most interesting and challenging issues is that the movement of the rotor is strongly related to its floating platform, which results in corresponding variations in the wake characteristics of the turbine. Because the aerodynamic efficiency of the downstream turbines is affected by the wake characteristics, the power output will consequently vary depending on the different types of floating wind turbines and floating wind farms used. In this study, the rotor movement, wake characteristics, and corresponding wind farm power output are analyzed using a numerical method for three typical floating wind turbines: the semisubmersible type, spar buoy type, and tension leg platform type with a 5 MW configuration. A fixed-bottom monopile wind turbine is adopted as a benchmark. The simulation results show that of the three floating wind turbines, the rotor position and wake center are most dispersed in the case of the spar buoy type, and its wake also has the lowest impact on downstream wind turbines. Additionally, the power output of the corresponding spar buoy type wind farm is also the highest at different wind speeds, followed by the semisubmersible type, tension leg platform type, and then the fixed-bottom type. In particular, at low wind speeds, the wake effects differ significantly among the various types of wind turbines.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi China Scholarship Council
Reference36 articles.
1. Grand challenges in the science of wind energy;Veers;Science,2019 2. Flower, M., Lenfest, E., Viselli, A., Goupee, A., Kimball, R., Bergua, R., Wang, L., Zalkind, D., Wright, A., and Robertson, A. (2023). Wind/Wave Testing of a 1:70-scale performance-matched model of the IEA wind 15 MW reference wind turbine with real-time ROSCO control and floating feedback. Machines, 11. 3. Aerodynamic damping of a semi-submersible floating wind turbine: An analytical, numerical and experimental study;Yang;Ocean Eng.,2023 4. Optimal output power of not properly designed wind farms, considering wake effects;Behnood;Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.,2014 5. Baker, N.F., Stanley, A.P., Thomas, J.J., Ning, A., and Dykes, K. (2019, January 7–11). Correction: Best practices for wake model and optimization algorithm selection in wind farm layout optimization. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.
|
|