Multidimensional Ecosystem Mapping: Towards a More Comprehensive Spatial Assessment of Nature’s Contributions to People in France
-
Published:2023-05-04
Issue:9
Volume:15
Page:7557
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Shmelev Stanislav E.123ORCID, Agbleze Linus45, Spangenberg Joachim H.26
Affiliation:
1. Environment Europe Limited, Oxford OX2 6JG, UK 2. Environment Europe Foundation Stichting, 2511CJ The Hague, The Netherlands 3. School of Management and Economics, University of Torino, Via Verdi, 8, 10124 Turin, Italy 4. Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 5. Rising Hope Foundation for Change eV, D-53117 Bonn, Germany 6. Sustainable Europe Research Institute SERI Germany, D-51103 Cologne, Germany
Abstract
Ecosystems are experiencing significant pressure from human activities, with 1 million species at risk of extinction. This is threatening to undermine the resilience of ecosystems, which provide multiple benefits to support human existence and are essential for the support of life on Earth. A number of conceptual frameworks have been developed as a guide for the assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) and nature’s contributions to people (NCPs), including Millennium Ecosystems Assessment, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity report, France’s National Ecosystems Assessment, the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services, and the Global Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In this paper, we compare the existing conceptual frameworks for the assessment of ESs and NCPs and derive a unified structural framework. Several indicators for characterizing the ESs/NCPs provided are selected and integrated through normalization. On this basis, and enriched by a number of culture-specific indicators, we conduct a mapping exercise illustrating the ES/NCP provision for the whole of France in a spatially explicit form based on a 1 × 1 km scale. Finally, we generate integrated maps depicting distribution patterns of different services and contributions across the landscapes of France focusing on economic, social and ecological dimensions. The results indicate that a non-monetary assessment of the complexity and diversity of NCPs is feasible and presents tangible advantages as compared to monetary frameworks. The paper concludes that provisioning, regulating and cultural services and contributions are geographically unevenly distributed and further analysis is required to assess the degree of complementarity, feedback loops and tipping points among different services. Our pilot research clearly illustrated the feasibility of conducting a highly disaggregated multidimensional assessment of ESs/NCPs at the national scale to inform decision making.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference137 articles.
1. The ecosystem services agenda: Bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy;Braat;Ecosyst. Serv.,2012 2. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services;Wilson;Ecol. Econ.,2002 3. The heartbeat of ecosystems;Palmer;Science,2012 4. Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Christie, M., Baptiste, B., González-Jiménez, D., Anderson, C.B., and Vatn, A. (2022). Summary for Policymakers, IPBES. 5. IPBES Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2016, January 22–28). Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services. Proceedings of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Fourth Session, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
|
|