Affiliation:
1. Department of Education, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan 38428, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Human Sciences, Assumption University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
3. Department of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Driven by the wave of artificial intelligence, the educational practice and application of robots have become increasingly common. Despite extensive coverage in the literature on various aspects of educational robots, there are still unexplored avenues, particularly regarding robotic support, robotic personality, and challenges in their applications. This study presented a systematic review of high-quality empirical research on the use of physical robots in educational settings. A total of 92 relevant papers from the Web of Science database were analyzed. Employing the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) framework, we investigated research questions across seven components, including the learning domain, teaching strategy, robot types, learning results, problems with using robots, robotic support, and robotic personality. The findings revealed that robots are most prevalently employed in language learning applications. When opting for teaching strategies, educators tend to favor those that incorporate physical interaction. Concurrently, humanoid robots emerge as the preferred choice among many. These robots, in human–robot interaction scenarios, often exhibit an agreeable personality. In terms of evaluating learning results, cognitive aspects like thinking, creativity, self-regulation, and inquiry ability are especially emphasized. Such results are frequently influenced by the informational and emotional support provided by robots. Nonetheless, challenges encountered by teachers, learners, and robots in this process are not to be overlooked. The findings of this study contributed to future applications of robotics in education.
Reference157 articles.
1. Alam, A. (2021, January 26–27). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA), Nagpur, India.
2. Shimada, M., Kanda, T., and Koizumi, S. (2012, January 29–31). How can a social robot facilitate children’s collaboration?. Proceedings of the Social Robotics: 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China. Proceedings 4.
3. Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks;Blanchard;Innov. Potential Technol.,2010
4. Computational thinking for youth in practice;Lee;Acm Inroads,2011
5. Social robots in education for long-term human-robot interaction: Socially supportive behaviour of robotic tutor for creating robo-tangible learning environment in a guided discovery learning interaction;Alam;ECS Trans.,2022