Physical Robots in Education: A Systematic Review Based on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework

Author:

Wang Huayi1ORCID,Luo Ningfeng2,Zhou Tong3,Yang Shuai1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Education, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan 38428, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Human Sciences, Assumption University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand

3. Department of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Driven by the wave of artificial intelligence, the educational practice and application of robots have become increasingly common. Despite extensive coverage in the literature on various aspects of educational robots, there are still unexplored avenues, particularly regarding robotic support, robotic personality, and challenges in their applications. This study presented a systematic review of high-quality empirical research on the use of physical robots in educational settings. A total of 92 relevant papers from the Web of Science database were analyzed. Employing the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) framework, we investigated research questions across seven components, including the learning domain, teaching strategy, robot types, learning results, problems with using robots, robotic support, and robotic personality. The findings revealed that robots are most prevalently employed in language learning applications. When opting for teaching strategies, educators tend to favor those that incorporate physical interaction. Concurrently, humanoid robots emerge as the preferred choice among many. These robots, in human–robot interaction scenarios, often exhibit an agreeable personality. In terms of evaluating learning results, cognitive aspects like thinking, creativity, self-regulation, and inquiry ability are especially emphasized. Such results are frequently influenced by the informational and emotional support provided by robots. Nonetheless, challenges encountered by teachers, learners, and robots in this process are not to be overlooked. The findings of this study contributed to future applications of robotics in education.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference157 articles.

1. Alam, A. (2021, January 26–27). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA), Nagpur, India.

2. Shimada, M., Kanda, T., and Koizumi, S. (2012, January 29–31). How can a social robot facilitate children’s collaboration?. Proceedings of the Social Robotics: 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China. Proceedings 4.

3. Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks;Blanchard;Innov. Potential Technol.,2010

4. Computational thinking for youth in practice;Lee;Acm Inroads,2011

5. Social robots in education for long-term human-robot interaction: Socially supportive behaviour of robotic tutor for creating robo-tangible learning environment in a guided discovery learning interaction;Alam;ECS Trans.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3