The Basics of Home Office (Re)institutionalisation from the Perspective of Experiences from the COVID-19 Era

Author:

Rymaniak Janusz1ORCID,Davidavičienė Vida2ORCID,Lis Katarzyna3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Business, WSB Merito University in Gdańsk, 80-266 Gdańsk, Poland

2. Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

3. Department of Labour and Social Policy, Poznań University of Economics and Business, 61-712 Poznań, Poland

Abstract

After COVID-19, the dynamics of home office development slowed down. According to the experiences of major companies, the problem is “fluctuating”. Research from the pandemic era covers various aspects and fails to present the concept of synthetic developmental conditions. Therefore, the issue of extending the organisation to home spaces was undertaken, identifying the determinants of the sustainable development of workplaces and organisations. The key is to create sustainable work systems, i.e., adapted to the environment, while being creative, critical, and productive. This study aims to establish the cultural determinants of home office development based on empirical research from the perspective of neo-institutionalism. For this purpose, the institutional logics were subject to operationalisation and the co-dependencies of metalogics with the types of organisational cultures assumed in the Cameron–Quinn OCAI model were established. The information was collected in a CAWI survey. The presented research procedure constitutes a methodical innovation. The results demonstrate a trend of changes in the dominating types of organisational culture from market control to cooperation and creation with a stimulating role of professional logics (occupation, organisation) from the perspective of working from home which brings sustainable management and business models. There is a subtle role of home logic and low employee readiness level. The adapted cultural approach demonstrates that increasing effectiveness of home office solutions requires development of integrated practices, which consider this type of work as separate and specialised. The past corporate failures and spontaneous methods cannot serve as grounds for strategies (long-term solutions). However, the research demonstrates a low level and limited range of employee impact on the organisational culture. It also indicates the need for additional analyses to determine the concept of designing workplaces in the Sustainability–Harmonisation trajectory.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference66 articles.

1. Wolfe, R., Harknett, K., and Schneider, D. (2022, March 03). Inequalities at Work and the Toll of COVID-19. Available online: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20210428.863621/full.

2. The Black Swan of the Coronavirus and How American Organizations Have Adapted to the New World of Remote Work;Wyld;Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res.,2021

3. Herzog, L., and Zimmermann, B. (2023). Shifting Categories of Work. Unsettling the Ways We Think about Jobs, Labor, and Activities, Routledge—Taylor & Francis Group.

4. The Five Paradoxes of Meaningful Work: Introduction to the special Issue ‘Meaningful Work: Prospects for the 21st Century’;Bailey;J. Manag. Stud.,2019

5. Graeber, D. (2019). Bullshit Jobs: The Rise of Pointless Work, and What We Can Do about It, Penguin.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3